The Trouble With Reform, by Omar Zaid
“When it is said to them: Do not corrupt the earth with your negative deeds, they say: ‘We are only doing reform!’ Beware! They are corruptors but they do not know that.” (2: 11-12)
“We have created many of the jinn and humans for hell: they have minds but they do not understand therewith; they have eyes but they do not see therewith; they have ears but they do not listen therewith. These are like cattle, even more difficult to guide – for these are the heedless ones.” (7: 179)
The first quote confirms the self-deluded estate of reformers and the latter affirms their reckless stupidity! The Pharisees were not only Kabalists[i] but also represented the nadir of post-Babylonian Judaic Reform. Prophet Isa called them hypocrites as well as ‘Sons of Cain and Satan’, which are prescient adjuncts to the descriptions given above. Roman Reformers successfully obliterated all record of the original Hebrew and Aramaic Gospels then exiled or ‘disappeared’ the Ebionite Church of James the Just. [ii] And it is clear from al’Hadith and sober review of the record that a significant number of Muslims have followed these well-rehearsed examples. The tenet here is that Iblis never changes the tactics of misguidance and hence one may safely conclude the concept of reformation is an oft-used tool in the practiced hands of the Great Deceiver!
Perhaps this is why Al’Qur’an never uses the word ‘Reformer’ in reference to the establishment of Islam. In essence, Islam, as God’s New Man in the earth, is an incarnate Reminder or society of ‘Warners’ rather than Reformers! Why? In defense of the postulate I offer an analogy: When parents give birth to a child, are they reforming that child? Obviously not! Parents are care-givers or stewards of that which is created and formed by Al Mussawir. If any reform is accomplished it is at the cost of what is created! Likewise, if a farmer plants a seed and cares for the tree until it bears fruit, has he reformed the tree or its seed? However if he neglects it, stunts it, modifies the seed or forbids it to bear fruit, what then shall we call such a person? Perverted, Deviant, Spoiler, Reformer, Genius?
“And when your Lord extracted from the children of Adam – from their spinal cord – their entire progeny and made them witness upon themselves, saying, Am I not your Lord? and they replied, No doubt You are, we bear witness [the Lord did this lest you say on the Day of Judgment, we were quite unaware of this, or lest you should say by way of excuse for your sins], All that happened was that our forefathers had committed shirk [worship of false gods] before us, and we, as the generations following upon them, were already conditioned by them – are You then, going to make us suffer for what these earlier falsifiers of truth had done?” (7: 172-173)
Considering this passage with care gives cause for both sufficient fear and justification for the thesis. Parents who condition offspring and bend them away from the non-sectarian path of hanif Monotheism with which they incarnate are indeed reformers! What’s disquieting is that the conditioned soul remains accountable for the denial (self-deception) because they’ve accepted and later propagate the deviancy: i.e., they choose to believe and practice the reformation of their inherent instinct for the hanif monotheism of Abraham without batting an eye at their heart’s objection! This is why Al’Qur’an is called both a Mercy and a Reminder by God! It is never called a Reformer.
Every Prophet of God was a Patriarch who did nothing to reform! On first hearing one might object, but the facts are clear and speak for themselves. These men brought the Word of God, spoke it as a reminder and warning, then received into their guidance anyone who repented in submission to what was already in their heart! In other words, the ummah of all prophets con-formed to inherent directives of the God-given potential with which they were born. Sectarian Reformers, to the contrary, engender doctrine by force or fervid campaign. Furthermore, these ambitious folk are content to rule kow-towing mimics who prefer an easy path to earthly sustenance rather than truth. Genuine men of God, on the other hand, have no desire to rule over such complaisant congregations because the Cause of God requires diligence, discipline, and sincere striving for knowledge and its just utility rather than the assuagement and pleasure of aggrandizement or mindless conformity.
The example of every Prophet who established a family[1] or Polity of God was to absolutely forbid and ruthlessly uproot shirkers![2] Reformers on the other hand, like the Freemasons Afghani, Abdul, Qutb and al’Bana, or the SS Mufti el-Husseini of Jerusalem,[3] tolerate or apologize for those who are profitably useful to their cause while promoting the iniquitous hidden agenda of their masters, be they jinn or men! This is because, as the surat states, they are blind, deaf, ignorant and heedless of the natural path to righteousness as a consequence of pride, the very first sin committed by the primal sinner, Iblis. It is much easier, so they envision, to roll-with, or even better, direct malleable tides of worthless public opinion in order to redefine the collective’s responsibility towards God; even at the price of corruption and murder, wholesale or not―the traditional Arabian methodology!
Accordingly, and in keeping with the metaphysical conditions I’ve described, I myself was born a Muslim! The trial I encountered was my parents didn’t know and it took 54 years before I remembered. In the meantime, I was subjected to many a reform movement, none of which I found completely satisfactory. Not until I looked into the mirror of Al’Qur’an did I see how un-conformed I was to our collective pre-primordial covenant of Surat 7: 172-3.
I didn’t need the guidance of any Sufi Sheikh, Ikwanite or Islamist with fascist proclivities on how to comb the hair of my soul and readjust its metaphysical garments. My penitent submission occurred as a natural course of grace-imbued events that withstood the onslaught of humanist ideals and maladjusted forces of social alienation and persecution! [4] Therefore, I posit that metaphysical Islam—as opposed to the Ummah—is a subtle mirror with a spiritual might so profound it transcends circumstances as well as time and space to remind us of the moment we stood before our Brooding Creator as described above and in the Book of Genesis— in order to consciously confirm and thereby reaffirm our covenant with God in the present. A fresh look at the book of Genesis confirms this:
Exegesis on the Book of Genesis by the Author
There are two works of Creation full of countless dominions chronicled in Genesis 1:1. Though pointedly brief, this verse covers aeons of what we perceive as time and contains initial reference to the ‘foundation of the world’ or cosmos. This is inferred by Gen 1:2, which is woefully rendered in most translations, as the original Hebrew has no word for ‘was’ nor does the Hebrew imply such a word. It is better read:
‘… became or came to pass waste and empty’,
which may be less palatable to reformed grey-matter but more accurately represents the author’s intent. Verses that follow describe in detail an Adamic Re-Creation filled with mysterious allegories; then comes Chapter Two with the stories of Eden, Adam and his fall; and then the story of Cain’s sin, judgment and his generation’s lineage. Genesis 1:1-3 is more accurately rendered as follows:
“From the best (or first fruits), Elohim shape the abode of judgment and the firm place. The firm place came to pass waste and empty; and darkness was upon the countenance of deep places, and the breath of Elohim brooded before the presence of the waters. Elohim said: ‘Become Light’, after which fire (or judgment) came to pass. Elohim inspected the light (judgment) that it was good, and set apart the light in the midst of the darkness.”
Water is not cited as being created yet it is present at the end of verse two. This may indicate water already existed. Being essential for life and as an important allegorical substance throughout scripture, Why is there no “Let there be Water” recorded? Neither did Moses write that God said “Let there be light!” What he did write is more accurately translated above. YHWH hovered before the ‘waters’ then spoke an imperative command: ‘become light’, after which ‘light’ (with fire as its source, according to the Hebrew root word), ‘came to pass’ and was ‘set apart in the midst of the darkness’. These ‘waters’ therefore, assimilated this light.
The allegory relates the plan of salvation. Apostle Paul, in keeping with God’s having set ‘the light apart’ in the midst of the darkness, states, in agreement with John, that God chose His children “from the beginning’. This may allude to God’s foreknowledge of those who would obey or disobey rather than divine pre-determination of obedience or disobedience. John says this ‘darkness’ is passing away because true light is now shining on the condition that we ‘love our brother’ whom Isa taught is “he who does the will of the Father.” Such love is not the tolerant niceness so popular among exponents of politically-correct New-Age rhetoric; but to the contrary, it is specific obedience to God’s commands.
Satan’s work and that of his minions is the darkness that covered the surface of the deep: the ‘deep’ representing God’s Wisdom. This darkness preceded the Adamic Prophetic Race and perhaps enveloped the various archaic species of hominids. Presently, it continues through the iniquity of sectarians, who, like Cain, fabricate their own religions. The darkness mentioned in Genesis is not a lack of sunlight but rather the absence of God’s legitimate government: i.e. His Kingdom in a man’s heart and a nation’s social spheres of activity!
The mystery thereby revealed in the Book of Genesis is in accordance with Al’Qur’an, in that all ‘waters’ were baptized by God into a covenant of light that recognized His absolute Sovereignty. Further inquiry reveals that any ‘reformed’ light is the darkness that veils God’s authentic governance from the eyes and deeds of men. This heedlessness is the result of choice rather than pre-destination, as predestination is itself a pre-determined consequence of man’s free-will to choose what is beneficial. What is pre-destined therefore, are the consequences of the choice. The mechanisms of these determinants are singular and peculiar to each individual, and we need not concern ourselves with their particulars, as the end-results are merely gradations of reward for either good or evil.
Satan ardently desires to take as many to hell as possible and will use any means necessary. His finest skills are manifest in the arts of religious sectarianism and the current impetus for social engineering or human resource management, which are euphemisms for economic slavery. Ephesians 6:12, clearly states that a kingdom of darkness governs the present age (one of many perhaps), and we know this age is reserved unto the judgment of fire (justice); fire being the source of all light and the root of the Hebrew word used by Moses in Genesis.
Therefore, in the beginning, God qualified and appointed all waters (men) to partake of His infinite beneficence by commanding them to become light. The root of this light is fire, i.e. fear and reverence for the judgment, justice and absolute holiness of God’s Word, which is Divine Law—i.e. “Wisdom begins with the fear of the Lord” as said Prophet Sulieman (pbh). This means that the ‘Day of the Lord’ is ‘the ‘Day of Fire’ – the Day of Judgment. When God inspected (the Hebrew terms in Genesis directly infer an inspection) and saw those men (waters) whom would adopt Satan’s suggestions as their law, He set aside the faithfully lighted waters in the darkness, upon a hill representing His authentic light or government. This is why Zion and later Jerusalem stood on a hill, both before and after the King David, and why the Ark of Noah came to symbolically rest on the mountains of Ararat. God chose and marked these fire-lighted waters from the beginning and God is determined to ‘save’ them. The Ark and its Temple and its people were destroyed, and the hill of God’s First Man, Israel, is no more. It now resides, as before, in our hearts. Islam, the final Polity, once had the opportunity to reign supreme but its Imams also succumbed to worldly passions and sectarianism.
Stand before a mirror and you’ll see an image of yourself as you are. Stand before Al’Qur’an and you will see the image in which you were created and the ends to which men are destined. Both similes are real and true, but only one is holy or ‘reserved for God’. Those who are veiled by submission to Satanic suggestion cannot perceive holiness, as stated in surat 7:179, and always revert to religious pride with self-righteous anger.
To the contrary, those who remember their pre-primordial covenant are ‘reborn from above’ spiritually when shamed and humbled by the knowledge (brought to their knees). These folk weep and beg God (not man) for mercy that by the power of grace they might conform to the image God viewed upon the ‘face of those waters.’[5]
Therefore, beware of revolutions and reformers: they are dark waters who have rejected the oil of God’s Light and the fire of His Judgment. Do not sympathize or apologize for them, and neither fight them unless they refuse to depart in peace! Warn them, and if possible, prevent them from doing wrong.
‘The Church of Neglect’ reflects disobedience to divine law and cannot be apologized for at death or on Judgment Day, because the grace of Divine respite for all Schismatics ends when the silver cord is cut and the veil of inebriating pride and apostasy is removed. For this reason, the Prophet said:
“Help your brother be he a wrongdoer or wronged.”
When asked for an explanation, he replied:
“You must prevent him from doing wrong: that will be your help to him.”[iii]
By grace are believers invited[6] to salvation through faith and the reward of good deeds; by grace are all miracles performed; and by grace is any polity of believers imbued with power. Power is what sectarians and feminists[7] desire above all else, and it is the grace of this authentic power the ummah lost long ago.
This tome and its siblings describe Cain’s posterity and their systematic institutionalization of the insignificant illumination of humanism under Iblitic insinuations vis-à-vis the Creed of Cain’s impressive Reformations of God’s Cause in the earth. May Allah reward your thirst and quench it, and thereby grant you the means and circumspection required to save the seed under your sway from such reformers.
Examples of Zionist Reforms & Sikh & Anglican Freemasonic Reformers
