Picasso painted this mark with a sapience missed by ‘all but a few’. His masterful composition and painstaking deliberation illustrated man’s inexorable destiny as a forlorn scenario of misery beyond what is palpable. Interestingly enough, he did it in terms I’ve torturously researched and described before I viewed his work critically. (1)
Note the pre-eminence of the ‘All Seeing Eye’. An angel lifts a disemboweled lady as she looks towards the ‘oil lamp’ of Faith in God’s Kingdom Within ( Quran says: a light-within-a-light ); her gaze fixed on what appears to be a prophetic mantle that shields her as a tent. It is an icon-free robe unlike tattooed Anglo-Catholic costumes! This arm and lamp shield her from the Eye of Horus. (2) She’s dead but her undisturbed visage comes into agreement with that of the angel, both are lit by a light that sets them apart from the rest of the scene, which tableau is besieged by ‘outer darkness’ mentioned in St. Jude’s epistle. (3) She, the horse and the angel share ovoid eyes, unlike other creatures.
And lo, there stands Apis with a distinctive set of ears and a ‘two-faced’ cycloptic-albino-bust joined to a cloven hoof; (4) — note the skull superimposed as nostrils and jaw on both bull and horse. The bull’s dark body seems to have once cloaked the bereft ‘madonna and child’, as it’s lifted by a demonic arm. An imp looks on from behind the bull’s head as the ‘speaking beast’ stands over a fallen warrior who bears the Eye of Horus. The beast speaks as if supervising forsaken Isis, whose sacrificed infant no longer suckles the milk of peace and security. Perhaps she’s crying out to her idol for solace? And what is this that comes forth from the mouth of both war-horse and bull … projectiles? … fire? … propaganda? … War against all peace?
And why is the war-horse’s body covered in newsprint save for where the light of the lamp falls on its body. The same ‘print’ is seen on the fallen warrior’s left leg? Is that the ‘Mark of Cain’ on his severed ‘right-arm’ and the occult pentagram of Zionists on his left palm? Is this dead man in crucified posture a fallen messianic pretender? … a disciple? Is that the woman’s husband at the far right—they both have the same eyes as the flame in the lamp, indicating they once knew the truth!? Is he under pennant icons (demonic teeth) as he’s swallowed by eternal shadow? (5)
Note the lack of natural light and any semblance of flora, and that the described source of Horus’s incandescent is a manmade light-bulb! I’m sure Picasso knew that Freemasons believed the pupil belonged to their Gnostic God. (6) The renowned father of cubist art should represent Fascist genocide with these ancient images … four years after the illuminati Seal was placed on the American Dollar just as Bush’s grandfather washed Nazi lucre and Rothschild financed the twenty nine planes that destroyed the ancient Basque Bastion. At the same time Bush’s lucre trained Hitler’s security dogs with Vatican blessing.
This work deserves its fame because it transcends politics and religion with a profound portrait of inescapable verity that captures all who see it. The venerable Seer never divulged his own interpretation and repeatedly admonished everyone to think for themselves. Of course, reflection depends upon what any reflector knows. How much of what you’ve just read did you know? — The painting could easily be renamed:
‘A Tale of Two Lights’ / ‘Rothschild’s Monocle’ / ‘Manifest Destiny’ / ‘The Triumph of Iblis’ / Genesis of Terror
There is more:
Three hundred years ago E. Swedenborg says Children of Cain (including Danites) were a polity who built ‘cities’ of doctrines (neuropolitics) that progressively represented schisms that separated each generation from principles of Divine Ordering that guaranteed a blessed cosmological Kingdom. Divine purpose was evolutionary; to reorder memory knowledge of what is celestial. This means myths so that man’s evolution of consciousness develops from symbols so that they intellectually reorder his will to habitually obey the Decalogue as God’s regent of Jesus’s kingdom within so that it manifest externally. This is far more than childish parroting.
Each generation successfully failed to keep the faith. They removed thoughts and willful uses of creation internally and externally so that the sins of the anti-diluvian church (Lamech) cannot be forgiven — except for a few like Noah. Noah’s name (not person) represents the next church. His name meaning those who rest in God’s faith and grace. These survived the flood of evil and were returned to regency (Gen.9.1-7). The Mark represents doctrines preserved by empires that never transcend materialism but retain mysteries of the ancient church whose direct perception the bible calls Adam. This empire mixing of good fruit with bad, if I remember correctly somewhere corresponds with Anthroposophy’s cosmology and Adam’s problem described in Genesis. Hence, we now have Gog (Deep State) and Magog (citizens who follow hypocites to the grave) because they were afraid to kill their nemesis.
NOTES & REFERNCES
1. Trinity: The Metamorphosis of Myth; Cain’s Creed: The Cult of Rome; The Hand of Iblis: An Anatomy of Evil and Summary Observations on the New World Order. These books constitute a Trilogy. [ https://alginkgo.com/product-category/books/page/2/?orderby=date ]
2. Bear in mind the lamps held by the seven virgins as described by Jesus. (Math 25). In my opinion, the virgins represent polities remaining faithful to their post-diluvial Monotheist Prophets; not to excluded indigenous nations.
3. See Matthew, Chapters 8, 12, 22, and Jude 1:6, as well as Peter 2:17.
4. Satan appears as a messenger of light‟ according to innumerable scriptural and apocryphal sources; that is, he pretends to be an angel delivering the word of Allah and is quite capable of teaching the truth. But according to Al’Quran angels are created from light while Satan is an elemental spirit (jinni) created from some extraordinary type of fire. Therefore, he does not qualify as an angel by definition alone, and any pretense on his self-exalted behalf is a lie.
5. Ensigns, especially used by royally commissioned British Armed Forces.
6. The British call students pupils: … “noun: the dark circular opening in the centre of the iris of the eye, which varies in size to regulate the amount of light reaching the retina.” – New Oxford Dictionary. Is this artistry and etymology mere coincidence?