Those who hate manliness have the greatest identity slippage. ~ Kierkegaard
Marriage allows plentiful opportunities for the doing of good deeds on a continuum per the two great commandments. Moreover, to optimize masculine and feminine identities with initiatory processing, enduring relations, institutions, and human survival require the stability of clearly defined genders that complement and conjugate of all three loves (see Cardinality in THINGS THAT MATTER). Over time these dynamics construct the New Jerusalem of Salvador Dali’s famous Corpus Hypercubis.1 Humans who attain and maintain moral consciousness–all others are ‘humankind‘—perfect an approach to mating that assures the full support and protection of females and offspring with communal approbation in compliance with natural boundaries; and this is universal. Dali’s cubes thus represent the hoary swastika our First Nations’ ancestors used when referencing all worlds, ancestors and creatures similarly submitted to universal law. Knowing this allows the sapient to rigorously vest the entirety of their communal welfare with this responsibility. This knowing and doing is the Rock upon which the New Jerusalem is founded (Rev. 3.12 and 21.2. ).
Wise spouses attend to communal needs with an enthusiasm that transforms yin and yang impulses into shared convictions that naturally direct activities to assure satisfaction in all three realms of love, in and out of the bedroom. A continuum of their collective efforts maintain health as destiny and spiritual evolution are peacefully manifest in countenance and reputation. This is the Promised Land of the Nativity’s famous ‘peace on earth and good will to men and women‘ who make the cut.
This magnificent scheme tolerates no play-acting or corrosive whimsy unless sapped by the tyranny that normalizes the deviancy that conditions humankind to ignorance and injustice for its gentile minions. Our knowing exactly how this divinely ordained and existential balance is achieved is immaterial to its archetypal framework of male-female dynamics. It simply must be done as a matter of priority because the validation of our innately constituted, gendered identity depends on the degree we consciously participate in its essence. Meaning, if for any reason you cannot marry, it is likely in your best interests to become subordinate to those who get it right. If you chose to do so, then do everything possible to support their success. You will then receive blessings from the Rahim (supernal) grace that overflows from such blessed heterosexual pairs. this is spiritual law.
Our clearly gendered identity kernel applies universally without deflation or risibility because it has everything to do with the ‘hows and whys‘ we take responsibility for the care, nurturing, welfare and protection of others. This social processing concerns the establishing of a hierarchy of notions and institutions that truly matter. Hence, social duty defines Islam’s haj.2 Thus it is that even if one is unable to marry it is advisable to support a successful couple so that one bathes in the grace of their dominion as they ideally embrace self-hood in unity with a view to purpose; fully knowing consequent eschatological outcomes.2
Pristine masculine development follows protocols that establish a standup male identity even simians comprehend. A lesbian butch whose brain has been masculinized 3 similarly attends her lover. This indicates that male and female territorial frontiers are innately jury-rigged by the same Intellect that rigged nature. There is no wriggling away from this sober conclusion. Ritual rites of passage for any LGBT identity do not exist except as deviations of nature’s intent. All such aberrations eventually became Mystery Religion jabberings. Presently, Gays irrupt inordinately and in great numbers without warm welcomes because the imagination of Queer validation is anathema to social cohesion unless ritually dressed in terms that admit submission to the copestone of heterosexual hegemony that forms the rock of human evolution. Indeed, outside of the Mystery Religion that formed the original Dionysian context that afterwards became so murderously deviant Rome outlawed and persecuted more Dionysians than Christians, occidentals have no rites of passage for misgendered souls. These occult venues have managed to keep the phenomenon camouflaged until recently; and even this perversion has oriental origins.
Obsessed by our innate compulsion to pair, some theologians insist on presupposing a bisexual pre-primordial fanciful creature dubbed Adam-Kadmon.4 Such hoary gayness lights the path for Alexander Dugin’s Fourth Way.5 Although other Adams and races likely exist, Genesis gives no indication that gender existed before Adam’s supposed rib-ectomy,6 Nor is bi-homo or mixed-up genderness given as divine attributes in any pre-primordial context that Adam could or should have reflected. The poor renditions we’ve inherited suggest that Eve came along as a divine afterthought so that man-Adam would not be alone. Their phrase, Eth ad Awdawm, has masculine connotations that refer to a corpuscular clear-skinned creature showing oxygenated blood. Moreover, and not to be taken lightly, God commanded both to ‘replenish’ the earth, which indicates that Earth was a previously ‘plenished’. In addition, Genesis records two separate creation events we’ve no time for here.
Some say humans once walked and talked with the Ancient of Days during the “days of eternity” (Micah.7.14), perhaps referring to the ‘Golden Age’ of all creation myths when sky, cosmic dust, and horizon melded all identities with transcendent goodness. We’ve since become profit-oriented, bottom-line business folk preoccupied with safety margins and YouTube ‘likes’. While some of us do eat the true bread of communal grace, our majority gorges on “dust that covers the serpent’s bread”—which is likely not baked from the best of all possible dough (Isa.65.25). Jesus even told his disciples to shake this dust off their feet (Matt.10.14), especially when folks refuse to discuss the Sphinx of vanishing horizons. Perhaps the serpent of Genesis is a figure-of-speech that represents our lust for the dust of mere survival. But I for one am sure that Iblis exists and did suggest to Eth ad Awdawm that his apotheosis was possible by saying: ‘You’re going to like being like God because then you can control all horizons’ — or something to that effect.
Because both ancestors prematurely ate from a tree that is most likely still in garden-central. Their newly acquired economic necessities and earth-bound proclivities caused Man & Mate Ltd. to become wholly invested in the business of ‘dust eating’. They disobeyed a distinct command not to go anywhere near that particular portal — at least not yet. Having lost the key of celestial grace, they were now vulnerable to innumerable things unknown. As neo-sapience evolved to cover this naked estate, they eventually learned to follow the Dao of fitrah, which is the innate chora Kant called sensus communis. Over time then accessed sufficient strength to enjoy the dust-covered bread of peaceful communal living by faithfully laboring to do what is best for their neighbors—beginning with spouses and offspring.
Christ’s last supper provides the formula for these acts of salvation (.2.14-26). Indeed, he showed his wayward brethren that the way forward is by ‘good deed doing’. He also predicted they would do even greater deeds than he (John.14.12). I sometimes wonder what could possibly be greater than saving all of humanity from hell? This path of salvation is the authentic way of the cross,which it is surely not human sacrifice, divine suicide, or ritual cannibalism.
note that the ascending body represents his church, those whop will npot be denied on the day of resurrection. https://uploads3.wikiart.org/images/salvador-dali/the-sacrament-of-the-last-supper-1955.jpg
Adam’s failed apotheosis after visiting forbidden ground in proscribed company provisionally arrested humankind’s development. This lot perceived little more than dust-ridden fruit, so that Paradise and G-d could not be found outside the experience of sublime sexual intimacy. After their investment in earth’s morbid goo, they vaguely recalled a fading memory of Elysian waters and delights.
They also left the protection and company of the Celestial Church — those ‘other trees’ in the now forbidden Garden. Those forests were divinely positioned to accompany and instruct them in the business of replenishing The Kingdom of God’s Cosmos (Matt 7:16) with good fruit. This developing amnesia could only be cured by confirmed apostolic faith after Adam’s contrition. Nonetheless, being caught up by the conditioning of bad-fruit maelstroms, not a few nascent groups–sons of men–rejected the felicity of godly re-education. Left in the dark and duly exposed to beastly vulcanization and hunger, as well as the specter of organic chemistry and hordes of unclean mud suckers bent on rapine (seen and unseen (Ps.22.17; Q.17.88), their forgetfulness developed full-grown political frenzies.
Although God warned them away from the evil, humankind succumbed to disbelief and continued to act on the apotheosis deception, which was no stroll through celestial gardens with well-appointed, trustworthy companions. Deprived of relational complementarity with the Tree Of Lives, they remained in need of everything elemental and subconsciously supernal; to include waste disposal and the operative knowledge of existential imperatives at corner cafes with shisha. Even so, most errant love birds since then have continued to to blame someone else for our self-imposed exile from the divine order that allows those who redeem their shadows to live more abundantly.
Consequently, G-d graciously protected the heaven(s) and all other firm places and countless suns from this church of the unredeemed. They had first to be proven trustworthy by becoming homosapient-sapiens by-death. Hominids whom David and Isaiah called dust-eating wiggle worms (Ps.22.7; Isa.41.14) had their curricula in exile severely and sternly modified by incarceration on a boggy firm place that was already filled with Tolkien’s hordes. Plans for rescue were in place pending first and second death tallies.
Essentially, G-d set us free to play in a treacherous mud puddle (Eretz), so we could learn why it is important to make our beds before trying to define the truth of things as they are. Only this time round —like my father once warned— “it was the hard way”.
NOTES
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/2231998506/in/photostream/lightbox/ ___ the cube(s) represent universal/divine law … upon which salvation depends because the christ within must die to it’s shadow (Jung / Al Quran’s Qareen) in order to resurrect and become light per Allah’s command in Genesis.
2. See: Until The Eschaton Is Spent. https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/frdPkKR9pY
3. Votinov, M., Goerlich, K.S., Puiu, A.A. et al. Brain structure changes associated with sexual orientation. Sci Rep 11, 5078 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84496-z __ https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/ZwppJMV9mO
4. Adam-Kadmon: Mad Theology
The task of homo religiosus is to restore the feminine to the masculine, to unite the two in a bond that overcomes gender differentiation by establishing the complete male who embodies masculine and feminine. Ontologically, there is only one gender in kabbalistic theosophy, for the female is part of the male… Jesus is a “transitional object” mediating between God and man for spiritually immature men and women, unable to establish a more formal, mature, Jewish relationship with God; an unmediated relationship, no transitional object, no transitional (traditional) mediator.
The quotation forms the bizarrely apropos idea that the phallus’ very existence appears extremely problematic, since its very appearance and being creates the gender dichotomy, the destruction of which is fancied a return to the idyllic realm of prelapsarian Eden (the androgynous man) … The religious-man (homo-religiosus) is to return the feminine to the masculine, to restore the original androgyny, appears to presuppose the removal of the phallus … What would be a more fitting ritual or sign-creating act, to signify the fore-going (so to say), then, (clearing throat). .. i.e., brit milah — ritual circumcision, ritual emasculation, cutting and bleeding the transitional object, which those not yet spiritually mature can’t bring themselves to dispense with? In other words, those Jews who thought of themselves as having disposed of the transitional object (phallus) necessary only in the old covenant, the first covenant, the covenant for the immature, claimed their firstborn Jewish Messiah to be the first Jewish firstborn (peter rehem) born in a manner all the foregoing suggests (and even the foreskin suggests) is the very point of Abraham’s ritual circumcision: the elimination of the transitional object, the mediator of gender-dichotomy, which will, in the Kingdom age, ruled over by Messiah, come to an end: it (the transitional object) will be finished, will have birthed enough, its reign will be complete. The coupling of the masculine and feminine results in a unity that does not entail the androcentric restoration of the female to the male but a genuine sense of there being neither male nor female, that is, a model of androgyny that does not subject the feminine to the reign of the phallus. ~ Professor ER. Wolfson, Open Secret, p. 220.
The Jewish gnosis, as expressed in the Bahir and developed further in subsequent works of kabbalah, is predicated on a notion of redemption that signifies a return to an original unity in the divine Pleroma. In this unity, sexual differentiation is transcended, but only as a result of the feminine being absorbed into the masculine [Tantric Buddhism’s sacrifice of the dakini], and not because gender difference is completely obliterated so that there is neither male nor female, in the famous locution of Paul.
When Eve was still in Adam** death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being. If he enters again and attains his former self, death will be no more [Gospel of Philip (68:22-25)].
In a second passage from this work (70:10-20), it is again emphasized that the cause of death in the world was the separation of female from male, a remarkable rendering of the scriptural narrative of the sin of the first couple in the Garden of Eden. The task of Christ, accordingly, is “to repair the separation which was from the beginning” by joining together males and females in the bridal chamber. ~ ER Wolfson: Language, Eros, Being, p. 165
NB: Extracted from an essay: Crossing [out] Gender Boundaries by JD. Brey: https://is.gd/Inwtgc I recommend reading the complete essay. It illustrates the complex idiocy of Jewish Theology and explains their puritanical view of sexual relations, which, in turn, produces perverted preoccupations that plague the earth.
** Eve was never in Adam. She was/is a completely separate creation and being… The scripture says ‘bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh’ — it does not say, ‘spirit of his spirit’—they err.
5. Twilight of the Magicians: Aleksandr Dugin and the War Against the West, by JR Nyquist
EXCERPT: … members of Dugin’s Yuzhinskii Circle called themselves “The Black inspiration of Yurii Mamleev (b. 1931), a Russian mystic and novelist described as
“a representative of the aesthetics of evil.”[vi] Just as Putin’s outward adoption of
Russian Orthodoxy is a disguise, so was the adoption of Russian Orthodoxy by
the Yuzhinskii Circle. As James Heiser’s research indicates, Dugin merely pays
lip service to Orthodoxy, but does not actually practice the religion. At the same
time Dugin has adopted all the weapons of cultural Marxism. As he explained in his book, The Fourth Political Theory, “classical Marxists consistently call for insanity….”[vii] Turning to his own theory he added, “Madness is part of the gender arsenal of the Fourth Political Theory.”[viii]
Dugin, as an alleged Traditionalist, says that white European males are enemies of “Tradition” because white European males uphold liberalism (the First Political Theory). Therefore, noted Dugin, gender identity must be broken. Here Dugin sets up Western liberalism as a straw man, describing it as a Marxist would – as racism, sexism and classism. “Now we are in this moment of a postmodern re-extension,” wrote Dugin, “and the final breaking of gender. The stages of this break are feminism, homosexuality, sex change operations, and transhumanity.”[ix]
“We stand on the transition between the hyper-modern and the post-modern, and we do not know where the truth and reality lies.” Therefore, he continued, “in a post-modern construction of gender, there will not be any men.”[x]
To destroy the order of being, Dugin advocates destroying the archetype of man. This archetype, he wrote, is falling to pieces. Conservatives can try though they may, but they cannot reconstruct “man” once he has been deconstructed. The only option will then be “androgyny as practiced by angels.”
Here we see that Dugin is a sorcerer putting ideas from various thinkers into a pot over which he repeats dark incantations like those of the weird sisters in Shakespeare’s Macbeth.
6. When properly translated, both AL’Quran and Genesis sight an ‘original creature-being’ that was split into two halves after its creation. Only then did G-d respectively fashion its complementary pairs as discretely male and female.