Until The Eschaton Is Spent BY DR OMAR ZAID
FIRST PUBLISHED ON J PERTERSON’S BLOG SITE FOR THINKERS, OCT 2024
Neo-Arendtists promote “Responsibility to Protect and judicial intervention by the International Criminal Court (ICC),” to protect us from evil. (1) Deeming international jurisprudence sufficient, they’d suspend all state sovereignty to lower humanity’s savage recidivism rate,(2) even as politically-correct rhetoric salts us with the hubris (3) that successfully devolves ‘new species of terrifyingly normal criminals’ (4) — including flash mobs of vulgar opportunists, proud robocops, and high-chaired, potty-trained, GED-certified, remote mass murderers of complete strangers. Meanwhile cosmopolitans fail to establish an existentially moral consensus that develops trustworthy governance. But there is hope.
Virtuous institutional apposition would go far to prevent ‘foreseeable and intolerable harms produced by culpable wrongdoing’. (5) Here, ‘culpable’ defines evil (‘e’) when e-doers willingly and knowingly cause reprehensible harm or loss to others; (6) especially if remedy requires superiorly fierce power. This Kantian premise postulates that systemic moral corruption is due to societal enmeshment with Orwellian e-authorities (pseudo-parents). (7) Neo-Confucianism’s apposition, for example, has a proven record of providing complementary symmetry between rulers and ruled when decisions are made by capable leaders (meritocracy) under right-brained, morally imbued, aesthetic dominion; and this, in deference to Professor Connolly’s socio-neuropolitics; (8) which suggests that Zhu Hi anticipated Prof. Connolly’s findings.
Colleges of the ‘New Physics’ hold ‘intrinsic dualism’ a worthy postulate. They include ‘underdetermination’, (9) Rupert Shedrake’s “morphic resonance”, (10) and the U. S. Air Force’s teleportation studies that intentionally produced “mixed-gauge symmetry”. (11) This might upset many who refuse to restrain e-doers from the overreach that upsets nature’s balanced symbiosis; a marriage bathed in the apposition of cautious opposition. Perhaps this is why scripture warns against surrender to e-inclinations that cause net-negative outcomes. Peace-on-earth plus a delightfully deathless life-to-come in the absence of culpable wrong-doers attracts folks in search of scapegoats to soothe the guilt-ridden rash that prevents the cited symbiosis. Forensically, this leaves beneficent, maleficent, and neutral inclinations in a cage-fight to avoid absolute censure as culpable wrong doers.
If ties-that-bind are conditional (12), perhaps cause-and-effect are also (?), such that acting out per Calder’s e-desire sets, or Garrard’s e-motivations (13) subjects one to being cut from the team of perpetual good guys. If true, e-motivational proclivities theoretically identify principal delinquencies that give just cause to forbid e-autonomy (14), to include censure, exile, and/or capital punishment. Accordingly, criteria that establish e-principles are of forensic concern, especially if the bench regards supernal justice. Moreover, because “criticisms motivated by reasons other than a desire to improve the legal system are not justified”(15), authority of censure attends the bench rather than congress, parliament, boardroom, or king. Hence, executives have no authority of censure without court approval, pending due process. Arguable, but that’s what the bench is for.
Nonetheless, e-executives prefer delete-able motives, histories, and testimonies prepared by Departments of ‘Just-Us’ in DC, London, Moscow, or University Park, Ltd.(16). Indeed, stasi-bumpkins commonly obsess over the critical textual censorship of inconvenient truth versus PR-demographics that guarantee Disneyland, DC, or Downing & Wall Street success — a far cry from the pragmatic moral purview of Roman Censors before tyrants dictated to sibyls and priests (17).
Now then: if contemporary democracies have been conditioned to depend on serried ignorance and misdirection to forge national character and zeitgeist, and if the unrestrained evil so caused directs us to less than net-zero outcomes, then civil failure is inevitable because civility demands defense against evil via informed mutual respect for others; a divination that inherently attends Kant’s sensus communis (18). Ergo, those who reject humanism stand like grim prophets as contemporaries corporately permit evil to fall like chem-trails. So reads the indictment as sinners and victims conspire to escape an inevitable eschaton. Thus, the dilemma faced is a tsunami of compounded ignorance plus bedlam. Neither can be censored nor avoided without morally imbued apposition.
Without it, imaginative desperation also allowed the ancients to scapegoat lone assassins as well as animals, and sub-human ‘others’: including children, virgins, and godly folks who knew how to make a natural poultice. (19) Indeed, the highest supernal indemnity recorded thus far sues for restoration and dominion in Mons Edan with exceptional perquisites, including especial pre-dispensations when clusters of hand-delivered bombs or black flags and germs attain sacralized ends. This highly imaginative fantasy floats e-exceptionalism east and west in tandem with pagan precedents and holy suicides under e-institutional auspices.
Because Amorite regents and Keke’s moral idiots remain (20), the ordeal’s longevity recapitulates; which lends the narrative merit and even champions a necessary ‘Causal Supernal Source’ of sensible bosons. Yet, Pauli, Jung, and Bohr summarily dismissed such determinism by abandoning the complementary balance that governs ever-tenuous certainty (21). This reductionist bent surrendered numerous academies to a Malthusian swarm of statisticians who hate right-brained modesty; whereupon we abandoned moral empiricism to re-birth shock and awe in littoral regions of Babylon’s ancient basin. Their offspring then seeded humanity with 9/11, deadly germs, and mRNA mania minus the poultice of truth.
Perhaps it is wise to revisit determinism in light of Noetic Science (22) if we wish to determine effective institutions of benefit for all. A mere suggestion, mind you, as investigations cannot proceed without politically-correct outcomes commanded by Departments of ‘Just-Us’ who prowl the great panopticon of post-modern collusion.
I advocate departments of justice that:
Renders censorship, not unto Caesars, but unto unbeholden, qualified courts;
Puts e-motivated agents and agencies speedily in the dock (23); disallows exceptional dispensations for executive privilege; and by-passes Fifth Amendment liars with irrepressible evidence and/or argument;
Assures a good-faith gendarmery whose bench is above reproach and encompassed by third-party, respected elders without ties-that-bind them to PC-favoritism: informed, worthy praetors who are dangerously capable and not necessarily lawyers;
Does not promote or tolerate ‘noble lies’;
Deem lying-to or by government agents a crime; corrects untruths; removes proven liars from authority.
Authorizes regional administrators who are known, respected, and accepted by qualified local franchise holders.
For if governance be e-inclined, then what else until the eschaton is spent and amity restored?
1 Royer, C. (2021). Evil as a Crime Against Humanity, Confronting Mass Atrocities in a Plural World. Palgrave/McMillan.
2 Kohn, J (no date). Evil: The Crime against Humanity. Hannah Arendt Papers, Library of Congress.
3 Owen D., Davidson J., (2009). Hubris Syndrome: An Acquired Personality Disorder? A study of US Presidents and UK
Prime Ministers over the last 100 years, Brain, Volume 132, Issue 5, May, pp 1396–1406,
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp008
Osnos, E. (2017, May 05)). Is Political Hubris An Illness. Newsletter, Daily Comment, New Yorker
4 Smeulers, A (2024). Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities: Terribly and Terrifyingly Normal? Routledge.
5 Card, C. (2002). The Atrocity Paradigm, Oxford University Press, p 3.
6 Calder, T (2003). The Apparent Banality of Evil: The Relationship between Evil Acts and Evil Character. J Social Philosophy,
p 366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00187
7 Van Inwagen, P. (2006). The Problem of Evil (2006), Gifford Lectures, University of St Andrews, 2003
Oxford University Press. p. 118
8 Connolly, W. E. (2002). Neuropolitics: thinking, culture, speed. University of Minnesota Press.
Zaid, O. (2022). “Neuropolitics”. In Trust; Ontogeny & Misplacement. Al Ginkgo, p 200
9 French, Steven and Tomasz Bigaj (2004). “Identity and Individuality in Quantum Theory.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Spring 2024), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds.)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/qt-idind/>
10 Sheldrake, R. (2005). The Sense of Being Stared At: Real or Illusory? J of Consciousness Studies, 12(6): 10–31.
Titchener, E.B. (1898). The Feeling of Being Stared At. Science, New Series, 8(208): 895–897
11 Davis, EW (2004). Teleportation Physics Study. AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY, MATERIEL CO MAND,
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, CA 93524-7048, Contract # F04611-99-C-0025, Program 62500F, Project 4847, Warp
Drive Metrics.
Jahn RG (Director) (2010). Theoretical Models: Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research, Scientific Study of
Consciousness-Related Phys cal Phenomena. Engineering & Consciousness:
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/ (accessed 17Jul07)
12 Jebely, P. P., Denora, L & Machado, Z. (2016, 05 Oct). The Ties that Bind: Commitment Letters under English Law.
Finance, Litigation, Client Alert, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP pillsburylaw.com
Polletta, F (2020). Inventing the Ties That Bind: Imagined Relationships in Moral and Political Life. University of Chicago
Press, Chicago Scholarship Online, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226734347.001.0001
Krystal, P. (2023). Cutting The Ties That Bind, on Eugenie Heraty Quantum Psychotherapy,
https://www.quantumpsychotherapy.com/healing-methods/cutting-the-ties-that-bind/ (accessed 02/09024)
13 Calder (2003) op. cit., 365.
Nys, T., and de Wijze, S. (Eds.) Does the Term ‘Evil’ Have Any Explanatory Power. In The Rutledge Handbook of the
Philosophy of Evil, Rutledge, London and New York, pp. 189–202.
14 Calder (2003) op. Cit, 271
15 Blacks Law, (1968). 4th Ed, p 52
16 Stenstrom, G (2024, July 18). The Council; Who is Running The USA., Unveiling the Faces of an Elitist Assault on
America Intelligencer Today.
17 Derow, P S (2015). “Censor. In Oxford Classical Dictionary, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.1463
Durant, W (1944). Caesar & Christ, The Story of Civilization, Vol III,
DelMar, A. (1900). The Worship of Augustus Caesar, A New Chronology of History & Religion, Cambridge Ency., NY.
18 van den Braembussche, A. A. (2000). Sensus Communis: Clarification of a Kantian concept on the way to an intercultural
dialogue between Western and Indian thought. H. Kimmerle, & H. Oosterling (Eds.) Sensus communis in multi- and
intercultural perspective. On the possibility of common judgements in arts and politics. Erasmus University Rotterdam &
Erasmus MC Research Information Portal. https://pure.eur.nl/en/publications/sensus-communis-clarification-of-
a-kantian-concept-on-the-way-to- (pp. 17-30).
19 Trimondi, V & V. (2003). The Shadow Of The Dalai Lama.Trikont-Dianus-Verlag
http://www.trimondi.de/SDLE/Contents.htmGirard, R (1979). Violence and the Sacred. Gregory;, P (trans). Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979,
ISBN-10:0826477186
Hutton, R (1991). Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles: Their Nature and Legacy, Blackwell,
UISBN 0-631-18946-7
20 Calder (2003) op. cit, pp 370-371
21 The Taoist Perversion of Twentieth-Century Science, M Billington, Fidelio, (II), no, 3. Fall 1994
22 Zaid, O. (2022). Sexology For The Wise: Essays on Marriage Queers, & Occult Governance. Al Ginkgo. pp 34-44.
23 This is precisely what the intrepid Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, et al., are doing
Kheriaty, A. (2022) The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Biomedical Security State. Regnary; Simon & Shuster.
(2024, Sep. 03). FREEDOM RESEARCH PODCAST; Censorship, Covid Crisis and the Decline of Liberal Democracies.
https://www.freedom-research.org/p/freedom-research-podcast-14-dr-aaron?utm_source=podcast-
email&publication_id=1356477&post_id=148439360&utm_campaign=email-play-on-
substack&utm_content=watch_now_gif&r=2ptnzd&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
SUGGESTED READING
Dunlap, F. S. (1894) The Ghebers Of Hebron. https://archive.org/details/ghebersofhebroni00dunl/page/n5/mode/2up