The Solar Cross, Dali, & Picasso — from my book The Forgotten Saints
Dr. Abbas Mahmoud Al Aqqad of Al Azhar cautioned Muslims not to utilize the GoB in any manner. I do not concur but do add ‘with care’. In its present form, especially as published by injudicious and unlearned Muslims, GoB deviates from esoteric truth historically. Albeit, with scholarly effort and divine guidance, which is possible, its coremessagecan readily be discerned. Efforts are hindered by Rome’s intractable machinations because the GoB offends Vatican apostolic auspices. So did two to three hundred other gospels presented to these Church Fathers of bias. Its original manuscript likely rests in a secreted vault under Jesuit lock and key. Apostolic succession is not a lightly taken neuropolitical matter and the GoB’s claims cannot please the Papal claims to divine guidance.
After research and years of further reading following the first edition of this book, I offer that following:
- Jesus—descended from Rachel—brought man’s will (faith) back to Celestial aspirations (not mine but Thy Will be done)
- Mohammad—descended from Hagar—represented The Burden on Arabia. He established a political entity in the prophetic manner that ancient Hebrews rejected Prophet Samuel’s leadership. They asked for a king in the manner of gentiles.
Mohammad and his initial followers actualized the marriage of celestial and material kingdoms to complete the promise made to Abraham. Quran outlines the same formula for mankind’s return to Eden. But this is not a geographic marriage but rather a Promised land to anyone who obeys the Decalogue. Compare this to a reconciliation between Cain and Abel. It is regretful that Muslims deviated within forty years after Mohammad’s death by returning to the tyranny of dynasty and mixing Quran with spurious Hadith.
In The Hidden Book in the Bible (1998), Prof. R L Friedman laboriously uncovers the chora of Biblical narrative by describing a continuum of Apostolic Authority — a pattern from Adam to Solomon. In accord with Semite genealogy, of relevant note is:
- • that after the myth of Solomon, this singular governing authority of God’s authentic temporal kingdom was then divided;
- • and never reunited as a divinely approved regency under heaven’s prophetic mantle (celestial tent of protection and guidance);
- • although ample opportunity was given.
The principle of prophetic government is a pattern of God’s expression of his earthly regency via man (men & women: created he them, male and female, and called them MAN). this included efforts by shamans and folks like Confucius, Debra, Huldah, Mariam, Buddha, and Zarathustra. All represented developmental stages of “the Kingdom of God” on earth. These and others unknown to us honor our Creator (El Yah/Allah) a as ‘King’ of all creation by following the Decalogue.
The prophetic institutionalizes a theocentric rather than theocratic state like Iran. Theocracies are governed by corrupted priesthood class who mix lies with religion to control the wills of their citizens. A theocentric state is governed by prophetic principles whose army and gendarmes are righteous men who eschew Freemasonry and other secret societies. Openness is the crux of authentic Apostolic Authority—all of who confront privileged elitist with truth. Man’s collective will begins to root-out his own selfish soul in order to become willfully conscious. This is the core message of the GoB. Medieval interpolators wrought troublesome mischief to the divine order and prevents folks from eating from the Tree-Of-Life.
Despite all evangelical ferments, the NT is not about salvation via blood sacrifice and most especially not via human immolation which is a corrupt pagan thesis. And though there is ample evidence that Satan requires human blood for what God’s permits as his ephemeral life of nemesis, blood is not a substance required for God’s favor. It is a vessel to carry the word of life. We are all then divine words who are meant to mature to wee gods who make correct decisions. Furthermore, except for interpolators and Greco-Gnostic sympathizers, Jesus is never recorded to say that mankind’s salvation depended on his blood. what he did say is this:
“Thou hast answered right: this do and thou shalt have eternal life.” ~ Matt.19.17-30, Luke.10.25
This straightforward response agrees, with ninety-five per cent of the GoB except for recognized interpolations. The passage quoted does not mention faith in a man-god’s exsanguination in-vivo as prerequisite for permission to enter Paradise or even earthly dominion. [1] Jesus directed a rich young man to reject materialism and obey the Decalogue with no mention of his impending suicide. (b) The GoB and core Biblical doctrines both make it clear that salvation depends on this obedience.
The ‘non-interpolated’ NT’s core—its theocratic chora, is a proclamation, reminder, and warning. It announces the coming restitution of temporal and metaphysical Kingdom of God, without which peace announced at the Nativity cannot be found or maintained. It also gives instructions for guidance while awaiting earthly regency, but not under Jesus as I’ll demonstrate. Earthly dominion was lost to Israel vis-à-vis their continual disobedience. Only the Kingdom’s Willful reception by the community (church or ummah) allows us to walk above the waters of theological chaos under corrupted priests. This is what happened to King Josiah before Israel’s exile to Babylon.
God’s ‘Kingdom Within’ us is made available by grace through some radiational means secondary to obedience and good deeds. This dominion is described in the charter given to Moses. The Gospels also make it clear that “The Kingdom of God” remains dormant in sensuality until we acknowledge Him as absolute Tyrant to the exclusion of all pretense. This gives us peace announced at the birth of Jesus for here and hereafter. Nothing else is needed. The GoB makes this very clear.
Although the NT is disturbingly contorted, its chora reveals an announcement by John and Jesus:
- the restoration of God’s temporal Kingdom “is at hand”
- Jesus says “My Kingdom is not of this world;”
- “The Kingdom of God is within you.”
This begs us to question the incessant posturing of False Pharisees. Jesus, GoB, and Quran all say that they bar prophetic directives by the imposition of sectarian bias and lies. But it is God’s Kingdom, not theirs—with us as subjected servants to Him, not them. The scriptures also make it clear is not by way of a human King, which brings to mind the rejection of many whom will be denied on the Day of Doom.
“Many will say to me in that day, „have we not prophesied and cast out many devils, and in thy name done many wonderful works?‟ whereupon I will say „depart from me, thou workers of iniquity! I never knew you.‟” ~ Matt 7:22
I now discuss a sensitive matter at the heart of polemics regarding the core content of the GoB.
Ancient Israel lost its birthright to regency of God’s Kingdom more than 2.700 years ago. The OT describes them as ‘God’s firstborn son’; God’s historical monotheist polity following Noah. [4]
Exodus 4:22 “And thou shalt say to Pharaoh, Thus saith Jehovah: Israel is my son, my firstborn.”
For those interested, I offer a full dissertation on this thesis in my Book: Trinity, op.cit.
By the time of Jesus, so divorced from God’s Kingdom the Temple was a den of archetypal thieves. This precedent reveals the Epsteinian Syndicate of money-changers and Papal Bankers. Jewish religious life was overseen by what the GoB calls an plutocracy of False Pharisees represented by dubiously appointed priests. Collectively they decided to murder Israel’s final prophet for exposing their charade, which Jeremiah described (Jer.32.34).
False Pharisees were sectarian parody of prophetic authority, not unlike psychopathic inquisitors. Those who’ve usurped leadership and curse Jesus still are. God removed Israel as promised by Hosea (vs.53). They murdered previous prophets and Quran says the murder of Jesus did not occur “but appeared to be so” without explanation. So don’t try. Since that time most Jews are blind to their loss of heavenly guidance and dominion. All sides of this monotheist Rubicon worship the murderous shedding of blood. Blood represents a medium that carried whatever radiance is the source of our existence here on earth. Simply put, mankind has lost its earthly autonomy to secret societies and human sacrifice in service to Jews who are not Jews and whoever manipulates them as well.
Divine guidance and its continuum with eternal ‘good’ is identified by man’s ability to reason what is immutably right and true (moral law). This has been exquisitely demonstrated by Kant:
To behold virtue in her proper shape is nothing other than to show morality stripped of all admixtures with the sensuous and of all the spurious adornments of reward or self love. How much she then casts into the shade all else that appears attractive to the inclinations can be readily perceived by every man if he will exert his reason in the slightest—provided he has not entirely ruined it for all abstractions. ~ Groundwork for the Metaphisic of Morals, Emmanuel Kant
Kant’s controversial claim was that pure reason could confirm the ethical validity of God’s decree in conceiving categorical imperative, the moral law. [2] ~ Ibrahim Lawson, Headmaster of the independent Nottingham Islamia School
Although we cannot touch the ‘pound’ in a pound of sugar nor the ‘good’ in a good deed, we do experience and know what they are. People who argue the point are mischief makers who prefer to change the weight of common sense. They dispute what is good in order to rob and/or gainsay, thereby obtaining advantage and power over their fellows. This priesthood serves corruption and describes the superbly selfish Epsteinian class. We now witness (Magog) foolishly praying for a President whom priests of Gog’s Deep State chose for the office. A sad fact of life under an authority who kills anyone who stands on the ground of truth which is Zion.
Zion is not a mountain or hotel in Palestine.
The anarchy created by vacuous polemics crosses all metaphysical boundaries set by ‘The Kingdom of God Within Us”. Nether can it manifest externally or internally under the guidance of False Pharisees. Fraudulent abstractions such as Trinitarianism, legalism, socialism, Keynesian capitalism, Jesuitical ‘divine-right monarchism’, reductionism, materialism, gilded ritualism, etc., are veils that blind Kant’s ‘eye-of-reason’ for those who reject prophetic guidance. They are not the tent or tabernacle our Creator provides us as His Divine Shelter:
To “dwell in tents” signifies what is holy of love, is evident from the signification of “tents” in the Word: Jehovah, who shall abide in Thy tent? Who shall dwell in the mountain of Thy holiness? He that walketh upright, and worketh righteousness, and speaketh the truth in his heart (Ps. 15:1-2),
_____ in which passage, to “dwell in the tent” or “in the mountain of holiness” is described by holy things of love, namely, the walking uprightly, and working righteousness. Again:
“Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their discourse to the end of the world. In them hath He set a tent for the sun (Ps. 19:4),
_____ where the “sun” denotes love..
Isms create politically-correct forums of intimidation and give exceptional cause for reform. Reformers are plentiful and indeed picked up swords in the past. Now you see the truth of the matter. Informed reformers with Kant’s common sense who know how to handle a sword have become rare.
Returning to premises and arguments implicit in the GoB and NT chora, Jesus left the prophetic mantle he inherited from Elijah with his Ebionite disciples. They did not become the Christianity we now know. The GoB says plainly that Jesus told them to do two important things:
- Tell all men that the “Kingdom of God is at hand.”
- Wait for the arrival of “Paraclete” who would instruct them in all truth.
Christians commonly think Paraclete arrived at the celebrated Pentecost’s miracle. They say a “Holy Spirit” descended upon all within earshot. Something unusual happened that day, but there is ample evidence this Primitive church awaited Paraclete’s arrival long afterwards. Both directives (tell and wait) are bound together as were ‘two men’ seen by Prophet Isaiah in a vision:
And he saw a chariot with a pair of horsemen, a chariot of donkeys, and a chariot of camelscand listened earnestly with great care. Then he cried, “A lion, my Lord! I stand continually on the watchtower in the daytime; I have sat at my post every night. And look, here comes a chariot of men with a pair of horsemen!”
Then God answered and said, “Babylon is fallen, is fallen! And all the carved images of her gods He has broken to the ground… this is THE BURDEN UPON ARABIA. In the forest in Arabia you will lodge, O you traveling companies of Dedanites.3 O inhabitants of the land of Tema.d
Bring water to him who is thirsty; With their bread they met him who fled [Mohammad’s Hijra to Medina]. For they fled from the swords, from the drawn sword, From the bent bow, and from the distress of war. For thus the Lord has said to me: “Within a year, according to the year of a hired man, all the glory of Kedar will fail; “and the remainder of the number of archers, the mighty men of the people of Kedar, will be diminished; for the LORD God of Israel has spoken it.” ~ Isaiah 2 & 21: Vs: 7-9 & 12-17
Arabia’s Burden is what Mohammad carried. Its delivery arrived when he and his disciples defeated Jews and their pagan human-sacrificing allies; all of whom persecuted him for thirteen years. This Burden places responsibility for “The Kingdom of God’s” temporal government upon Arabia as ‘brethren’ or cousins of Ancient Hebrews = ach. This was also predicted by Moses. (e) The chapter mentions by name tribes from Ishmael and Midian (f) responsible for ministering to Mohammad and bearing witness to his destruction of Babylon’s Idolatry in Arabia when he entered Mecca (Kedar) in triumph. (g) He destroyed all idols in the Kabba, the temple of Al Lat,a goddess derived from Babylon’s Queen of Heaven Cult of Semiramis/Ishtar, and killed her priests (warlocks) and her siren (witch). (h)
Many are presently involved with inter-faith dialogues with entities that OT calls ‘Babylon’ and whose auspices that Revelation says her Queen of Heaven rides the beast of sub-human misdirections that bring hell. It represents a regency inimical to monotheism by virtue of idols, icons, symbols, sigils, magic, and mythical fabrications of celebrants toadying to warrior ‘kings–of-the-earth’. Its cult of Illuminati Humanism has overwhelmed reason. All have forgotten what great enemies iconographers are because they reject the first commandment of the Decalogue.
I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage [to evil]. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them. It is written: “You shall worship the Lord your God and him only shall you serve.”
But this is written for the benefit (supernal grace) for anyone who willfully eschew evil. All others send themselves to hell in the hereafter by bringing and clinging to hell in the present. When Sala’udin met with Richard the Lion Heart, they met as respected enemies. It would do well for us to remember the boundaries that separated us from God’s Kingdom because that Peace promised at the Nativity is forever. Bowing down to Freemasonic images like the Statue of Liberty, Caesar’’s Britania, or sigils and Rome’s idols are polemical disobedience.
Read this carefully:
And when there came to them a Messenger from Allah, confirming what was with them, a party of the People of the Book threw away the Book of Allah behind their backs, as if they did not know! They followed what evil ones gave out (falsely) against the power of Solomon; the blasphemers were not Solomon but evil ones, teaching men Magic, and such things as came down at Babylon to the angels Hārūt and Mārūt.
But neither taught anyone (such things) without saying: “We are only for trial; so do not blaspheme.” They learned from them the means to sow discord between man and wife [Swedenborg says these mean Truth & Goods from Truth]. But they could not thus harm anyone except by Allah’s permission. And they learned what harmed them, not what profited them.
And they knew that the buyers of magic [e.g. Simon Magus] would have no share in the happiness of the Hereafter. And vile was the price for which they did sell their souls, if they but knew! If they had kept their Faith and guarded themselves from evil, far better had been the reward from their Lord, if they but knew!
O you of Faith! Say not (to the Messenger) words of ambiguous import, but words of respect; and listen (to him): to those without Faith is a grievous punishment. It is never the wish of those without faith among the People Of The Book, nor of the pagans, that anything good should come down to you from your Lord. But Allah will choose for His special Mercy whom He will―for Allah is Lord of grace abounding. — Quran, Sūrah (The Heifer) 102-107
Abraham and Mohammad were consummate iconoclasts who drew boundaries that refute the same idolatry that always seduces the world with tolerance for evil authorities. The current concept of lenience, that of turning the other cheek is sedition against God’s Kingdom on Earth. It permits enemies of truth an advantage which warriors like Sala’udin (a Kurd), General Patton, or Ali whom all Shi’ites in Iran admire, would never permit.
Respecting spiritual and earthly realities that lenience allows, I submit verses from the GoB that states what Jesus said:
Ye have not chosen me but I have chosen you, that ye may be my disciples. If then the world shall hate you, ye shall be truly my disciples for the world hath been ever an enemy of servants of God. (XVIII)
There was a man who gave money to his neighbors that they might trade with it, and the profit should be divided in a just proportion. And some traded well, so that they doubled the money. But some used the money in the service of the enemy of him who gave them the money, speaking evil of him. Tell me now, when the neighbor shall call the debtors to account how shall the matter go. (LXI)
Lord God, who by thy providence provide all things necessary for thy people Israel, be mindful of all the tribes of the earth, which thou hast promised to bless by thy Messenger, for whom thou didst create the world. Have mercy on the world and send speedily thy Messenger, that Satan, thine enemy, may lose his empire. And having said this, Jesus said three times: So be it, Lord, great and merciful! (LXVII)
Servants of God and their disciples are His Messenger to the world = ADAM (reborn/regenerated). Lenience does not defeat empires of sin when they cross boundaries into your Promised Land. Only good actions and justice do.
OT prophets called archaic solar-cross cults a religion of mixed-doctrine or “mixed-wine”. But this was not always so. Most worshiped a physical sun or astro-theology, albeit the original cult of Adam’s Church revered the sun after the fall as a representative of our Creator. The Mark or Symbol of Cain’ is most likely the cross of the Ancient Mystery Religions that was imposed on this ancient people by a False Pharisee seeking apology for his sin. It is now depicted in its Jesuit version. [4] Solar icons such as the swastika are distinctively reverenced and now represents an enemy of the Lord because it is imperialist selfish obsession which secret societies hold as a fascist allied bond. But E Swedenborg has something to add to our collection of arcana:
___ By the words “Cain went out from the faces of Jehovah” is signified that faith was separated from the good of the faith of love; “he dwelt in the “land of Nod” signifies outside of truth and good; “toward the east of Eden” represents near the intellectual mind, where love reigned before the flood [self-willed murder of neighbor and of one self due to sin].
___ To “dwell in the land of Nod” signifies outside of truth and good; the word “Nod” is to be a wanderer and a fugitive; “a wanderer and a fugitive” is to be deprived of truth and good [no peace]. ___ That “toward the east of Eden” signifies near the intellectual mind, where love had reigned [before the murder of Abel], and also near the rational mind, where charity had previously reigned; “the east of Eden” is the Lord, and “Eden” is love. ___ With men of the Most Ancient Church, the mind, consisting of the will and the understanding, was one [I and my Father are one] so that understanding was joined to will. They made no distinction between love, which is of the will, and faith, which is of the understanding, because love was the all in all, and faith was of love. But after faith was separated from love, as was the case with those who were called “Cain” no will reigned any longer [= Murder], and as in that mind the understanding reigned instead of the will, or faith instead of love, it is said that he “dwelt toward the east of Eden;” was distinguished or “had a mark set upon it” that it might be preserved for the use of mankind. ~ E. Swedenborg
Snoldevel stone’s photograph in arild-hauge.com
Dali’s Hypercubus: The cubes represent New Jerusalem.
Jesuit Seal or Sigil. IHS = With this sign (sigil) you shall conquer with solar halo and cross above the letter (communion wafer). Other scholars suggest the acronym represents Isis, Horus, and Set, or Pharaoh’s chi rox (ankh) which is a corruption of sexual mysteries at the time of Moses.
The solar cross (swastika) was used universally to symbolize God’s love and was drawn on rocks 30-40,000 years ago. It is not Calvary or human sacrifice. The real pact between heaven and earth is depicted by Dali, with every human being upon the cross of contrition while his/her soul watches them suffers the redemption of self-willed sin. Picasso in Guernica depicts hell on earth without this contrition (Appendix V). Ongoing polemics attached to the GoB may then be placed in a formal gestalt perspective.
The corrupted solar-cross represents cults that practice ritual human sacrifice and/or imperial war on the part of corrupted elitist. Their priests have always been revered and feared by uninformed masses who fear death. The Catholic Eucharist celebrates human immolation and cannibalism which is a Corrupt Gnostics of LGBT persuasion. This includes communion ritual involving spermatophagia and other heinous sex-rites. Some involve menstrual blood mixed with semen or the Soma or Tantric Eucharist celebrated by sub-humans. (b) The imagery of Guernica is filled with icons associated with the religion of Baal and are still utilized. Not the least of these is covert international tyranny under Jesuit direction; growing in potency since the 16th Century. Ignatius Loyola, their revered founder, was an Marano Illume: a Rosicrucian adept of Afghan Allumbrados [see Cain’s Creed].
This detour is more than a tangent since inter-religious dialogues and political parties are generally under Jesuit influence. We must be made aware of their true colors and question the purpose of dialogue when entering their company. If it’s to keep an enemy close at hand (Sun Tzu) be advised all should be well if your praetorians are prepared. But if one thinks you can actually treat with these people for ultimate advantage or altruism, it is a foolishness. Only naive persons do this and shows a lack of true guidance and knowledge of history. If you doubt me, please read the Jesuit oath of service (Appendix VI).
On January 27, 2003, the Guernica reproduction in the UN Security Council was covered with a large blue curtain. Press Secretary, Fred Eckhard, said the covering provided “an appropriate background for the cameras.” They were concerned the antiwar masterwork would not make a good backdrop for speeches advocating Zionist bombing of Iraq. As the US continue their boasts of “shock and awe”, Guernica is a chilling reminder of what such military operations mean for civilians. On Feb. 5th, 2003, US Secretary of State, Colin Powell — a frequent guest of Knights of Malta, a most Catholic, Jesuitical and Freemason sect with roots in corrupt Templars (but not righteous Knights redeemed from Cain’s posterity) — lied to the world. Picasso’s mural was completely covered. The flags of Security Council member nations were placed before the censored artwork.
As Maureen Dowd, writing for the New York Times, wrote:
”Mr. Powell can’t very well seduce the world into bombing Iraq surrounded on camera by shrieking and mutilated women, men, children, bulls and horses.”
NOTES & REFERENCES
1. Elah or Alah is another form of Elohim: a combination of El or Strength and Alah or Swear. See Strong’s 425 and Scofield’s Reference Bible, First Edition — it is recorded that Allah had been deleted from all revised texts. It is also thought to be a combination of two other words meaning ‘the God’, and is used in reference to God more than 2500 times in the OT. All invocations in Islam definitely identify Allah with ‘The God of Abraham’ and not some tree- or moon-god as is commonly taught by many illiterate pastors who’ve never read Al’Qur’an. The Tetragrammaton: YHWH, pronounced Yahveh, in original form is Yah. El was used as ‘Lord, King, or Chief’. The combination El-Yah or Lord-God is quite sensible, and it is not inconceivable that El-Yah, Al-Yah, or the Aramaic Eli reportedly spoken on the cross, are derived from this use. The first inscription bearing the name Yahveh is found on the famous Moabite Stone of Kennite genesis. YHWH means I AM WHO AM or I BE; or I Am Who I decided To Be. See: Yahweh, Yashua & You by Gail Melvin, 1998, ISBN 0-9665602-0-5 #98-91512, an excellent treatise on the derivation and deletion of God’s name from the Biblical texts, including scholarly references.
2. See, Trinity, The Metamorphosis of Myth for dissertation.
3. “Many will say to me in that day, „have we not prophesied and cast out many devils, and in thy name done many wonderful works?‟ whereupon I will say „depart from me, thou workers of iniquity! I never knew you.‟” ~ Matt 7:22
4. See Exodus 4:22 “And thou shalt say to Pharaoh, Thus saith Jehovah: Israel is my son, my firstborn.” For those interested, I offer a full dissertation on this thesis in my Book: Trinity, op.cit.
5. Usury, The Root Cause of Injustices in Our Time, Lecture 7, “The Setting,” p. 47. Pub. By PAID, P.O. Box 436, Norwich, England, NR3 1LL
6. The word translated as camel or rider has a root meaning ‘burden bearer’, referring to a person not an animal or dromedary. Also, the verse indicates that the riders and their animals were ‘yoked together’, which I opine indicates Prophets Isa and Mohammad. There is another Hebrew word, specifically for ‘camel’, which is not used in this passage. The text seems to indicate someone who is given a heavy task. The verse also refers to a lion as the rider, who then declares Babylon is fallen while breaking the idols to pieces, which is exactly what Mohammed did at the Kabah on his triumph in Mecca.
7. An Arabian people named in Genesis 10:7 as descended from Cush; in Genesis 25:3 as descended from Keturah.
8. A region adjacent to Yathrib (Madina) inhabited by the tribes descended from Tema, of the progeny of Ishmael.
9. See Deut 18:15-18 ‘… a prophet will I raise up unto them from among their brethren (ach) like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.” Note: the word ach, meaning brethren, specifically refers to a near relative, i.e. a cousin or fellow brother countryman, whereas the Hebrew reya refers to a close brother or even a husband as brother to his wife, denoting intimacy. Therefore the prophet spoken of cannot be Isa. The translators are quite careless with these specifics.
10. Abraham’s descendants via Keturah.
11. The settlements of Kedar were probably in the Northwest of Arabia, not far from the borders of Palestine. Assyrian inscriptions have thrown light upon the history of the tribe. There, Kedar is mentioned along with the Arabs and Nebaioth, which decides its identity with Kedar of the Old Testament, and there is found also an account of the conflicts between the tribe and King Assurbanipal. Of the Ishmaelite tribes, Kedar was one of the most important, and thus in later times the name came to be applied to all the wild tribes of the desert. It is through Kedar (Arabic, keidar) that Muslim genealogists trace the descent of Mohammed from Ishmael.
12. See, Trinity, op.cit., for dissertation and references. The word translated as “mark” in Gen. 4:15 is ‘owth, which could mean a sign, an omen, a warning, or a remembrance.
a. Elah or Alah is another form of Elohim: a combination of El or Strength and Alah or Swear. See Strong’s 425 and Scofield’s Reference Bible, First Edition — it is recorded that Allah had been deleted from all revised texts. It is also thought to be a combination of two other words meaning ‘the God’, and is used in reference to God more than 2500 times in the OT. All invocations in Islam definitely identify Allah with ‘The God of Abraham’ and not some tree- or moon-god as is commonly taught by many illiterate pastors who’ve never read Al’Qur’an. The Tetragrammaton: YHWH, pronounced Yahveh, in original form is Yah. El was used as ‘Lord, King, or Chief’. The combination El-Yah or Lord-God is quite sensible, and it is not inconceivable that El-Yah, Al-Yah, or the Aramaic Eli reportedly spoken on the cross, are derived from this use. The first inscription bearing the name Yahveh is found on the famous Moabite Stone of Kennite genesis. YHWH means I AM WHO AM or I BE; or I Am Who I decided To Be. See: Yahweh, Yashua & You by Gail Melvin, 1998, ISBN 0-9665602-0-5 #98-91512, an excellent treatise on the derivation and deletion of God’s name from the Biblical texts, including scholarly references.
b. All human beings that are born, however many and of whatever religion, can be saved, provided they acknowledge God and live according to the commandments in the Decalogue, which forbid committing murder, adultery, and theft, and bearing false witness, because to do such things is contrary to religion and thus contrary to God. With such persons there is the fear of God and the love of the neighbour: the fear of God because they think that to do these things is to act against God; and the love of the neighbour, because to murder, to commit adultery, to steal, to bear false witness and to covet the neighbour’s house and his wife is to act against the neighbour. Because these persons have regard to God in their life and do no evil to the neighbour, they are led by the Lord; and those who are so led are also taught in accordance with their religion concerning God and the neighbour; for those who so live love to be taught, but those who live otherwise have no such desire. As they love to be taught, after death when they become spirits they are also instructed by angels and willingly receive such truths as are in the Word. http://smallcanonsearch.com/read.php?book=dp§ion=253
c. The word translated as camel or rider has a root meaning ‘burden bearer’, referring to a person not an animal or dromedary. Also, the verse indicates that the riders and their animals were ‘yoked together’, which I opine indicates Prophets Isa and Mohammad. There is another Hebrew word, specifically for ‘camel’, which is not used in this passage. The text seems to indicate someone who is given a heavy task. The verse also refers to a lion as the rider, who then declares Babylon is fallen while breaking the idols to pieces, which is exactly what Mohammed did at the Kabah on his triumph in Mecca.
d. A region adjacent to Yathrib (Madina) inhabited by the tribes descended from Tema, of the progeny of Ishmael.
e. See Deut 18:15-18 ‘… a prophet will I raise up unto them from among their brethren (ach) like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.” Note: the word ach, meaning brethren, specifically refers to a near relative, i.e. a cousin or fellow brother countryman, whereas the Hebrew reya refers to a close brother or even a husband as brother to his wife, denoting intimacy. Therefore the prophet spoken of cannot be Isa. The translators are quite careless with these specifics.
f. Abraham’s descendants via Keturah.
g. The settlements of Kedar were probably in the Northwest of Arabia, not far from the borders of Palestine. Assyrian inscriptions have thrown light upon the history of the tribe. There, Kedar is mentioned along with the Arabs and Nebaioth, which decides its identity with Kedar of the Old Testament, and there is found also an account of the conflicts between the tribe and King Assurbanipal. Of the Ishmaelite tribes, Kedar was one of the most important, and thus in later times the name came to be applied to all the wild tribes of the desert. It is through Kedar (Arabic, keidar) that Muslim genealogists trace the descent of Mohammed from Ishmael.
h. See Deut 18:15-18 ‘… a prophet will I raise up unto them from among their brethren (ach) like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.” Note: the word ach, meaning brethren, specifically refers to a near relative, i.e. a cousin or fellow brother countryman, whereas the Hebrew reya refers to a close brother or even a husband as brother to his wife, denoting intimacy. Therefore the prophet spoken of cannot be Isa. The translators are quite careless with these specifics.
i. According to corrupt Naasenes, when Jesus declares that “there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake,” he was simply repeating an injunction which had been taught throughout Asia Minor by the cult of Attis for more than a thousand years. Hippolytus elaborates by adding that, according to the Naasenes, “the ineffable mystery of the Samothracians, which it is allowable” only for “the initiated to know” was precisely the same as that proclaimed by Christ when He declared:
1. “If ye do not drink my blood, and eat my flesh, ye will not enter the kingdom of heaven.” (John 6:53)
2. This flesh-and-blood sacrament, states Hippolytus, is according to the Naasenes, called Corybas [spermatophagia] by Phrygians as well as by those “Thracians who dwell around Haemus.”Now the expression “that which is unseemly” signifies, according to these (Naasseni), the first and blessed substance, figureless, the cause of all figuresto those things that are moulded into shapes. ‘and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.’ [Rom 1:27]. For in these words which Paul has spoken they say the entire secret of theirs [spermatophagia], and a hidden mystery of blessed pleasure, are comprised. ~ Hippolytus: Refutation of All Heresies, Book V
see also: © Victor und Victoria Trimondi THE SHADOW OF THE DALAI LAMA: Sexuality, Magic and Politics in Tibetan Buddhism / Spermatophagia: The Tantric Eucharist and ECCLESIA GNOSTICA CATHOLICA: THE EUCHARIST by Clément de Saint-Marcq (1906). Translated by Susanne Williams, Rose A Starr and Joe Collins, 1998, Ordre de la Rose-Croix du Temple et du Graal, of Gérard Encausse (aka: Papus), their Secretary was Chevalier de Saint-Marcq