Those who hate manliness have the greatest identity slippage. ~ Kierkegaard
An Excerpt From SEXOLOGY FOR THE WISE
Marriage allows plentiful opportunities for the doing of good deeds on a continuum per the Two Great Commandments. Its challenging grace allows us to optimize masculine and feminine congruence via the initiatory processing of enduring relations, institutions, and survival metrics — all of which require the stability of clearly defined gender identities that complement and successfully conjugate the three loves I’ve explained in my essay, Cardinality. Over time ideal marital dynamics produce The New Jerusalem of Salvador Dali’s Corpus Hypercubis.1 But death-to-self’s metamorphic power must first be realized before the resurrection, and consciously so to avoid the second death.
Those who attain and maintain the moral consciousness that follows ‘death to selfishness’ are resurrected and given a chance to become human—all others remain at the humankind hominid level, or more sadly, even worse. Those who succeed go on to perfect an approach to mating that assures their community’s full support and protection for females and offspring in compliance with natural boundaries. Those who fail to do this, somehow or other use them as shields. The sociology is universal. Dali’s cubes thus represent the hoary swastika our First Nations’ ancestors used when referencing the dynamics that govern all corners of all worlds, all ancestors, and all creatures under the lemiscate of universal law. Knowing this is what permits the sapient to rigorously vest communal welfare with those who can carry the responsibility. This is because the shared experience of our complementary human ‘knowing and doing’ is the righteous Rock of Communion (Christ or Ummah) upon which any similar group can establish New Jerusalem within the boundaries of Abraham’s Promised Land (Rev.3.12 & 21.2.). It is what Communists and Democrats pervert.
Wise couples who attain this ideal rank attend communal needs with an enthusiasm that transforms yin and yang impulses into the communion of shared convictions. In turn, their infectious deeds naturally attract and direct activities that assure satisfaction in all three realms of love, in and out of the bedroom. Their faithful continuum of collective effort forms an inviolable solar system wherein supernal (rahim) grace maintains health even as destiny and maturity daily manifest with successive waves of waxing countenance and reputation. This Promised Land of the Nativity’s famous ‘peace on earth and good will” is intended for all men and women’ who make the cut. It is entirely conditional on keeping the Two Great Commandments, which begins with Your Closest Neighbor. (https://alginkgo.com/shop/books/your-closest-neighbor/)
This magnificent scheme tolerates no play-acting or corrosive whimsy unless sapped by the tyranny that normalizes deviancy; which, in its turn, conditions humankind to become compound ignoramuses who guarantee injustice. Even so, to know exactly how this divinely ordained balance is existentially achieved is immaterial to the archetypal framework of male-female (yang-yin) dynamics. It simply must be done because the validation of our innately gendered identity depends on the degree to which we consciously participate in its essence. Hence, if for any reason you cannot marry, it is in your best interest to support those who get it right. Do everything possible to aid their success so the supernal grace of their Promised Land baptizes you as well. This is communion’s divine order and spiritual law.
Our clearly gendered archetypal identity kernels apply universally without deflation or risibility because gender has everything to do with the ‘hows and whys‘ we take responsibility for nurturing and protecting ourselves and others. Our social processing, no matter the cultural milieu, concerns the establishment of a hierarchy of notions (myths) that birth institutions (government) for which communal welfare truly matters. This path to civilized social duty defines, not only the Dao of Abraham and Confucius but also, when rightly discerned, Islam’s haj.2 So, if one is unable to marry it is best to become subordinate to successful couples without squabbling over their dominion because the latter’s moral duty inherently embraces divinely ordered purposes with optimized eschatological outcomes for all.3
Pristine masculine development, for example, naturally establishes a standup male even simians comprehend. Indeed, a lesbian butch4 similarly attends her lover. Thus, our ontological gendered personae, both male and female, define territorial frontiers that have been jury-rigged by the same Intellect that fixed nature. There is no wriggling away from this conclusion. Moreover, rites of passage for any LGBT identity do not exist except as deviations of nature’s intent. All such aberrant apologies have become the Mystery Religion jabberings of fraternal siblings and occult speculators who can’t make the cut.
The confusion of this babble is so great that sundry Gay populations presently and extraordinarily irrupt in great numbers — mostly without warm welcomes because Queer validation runs afoul of genuine social cohesion. They are so fundamentally disruptive of ley lines and human radar that they must feign submission to the copestone of heterosexual hegemony that forms the rock of human evolution. Indeed, occidentals have no rites of passage for misgendered souls. That pretense is the task of Lady Liberty’s masonry. Indeed, her Mother Goddess cult became so murderously deviant that Rome outlawed and persecuted more Dionysians than Christians. Occult venues like the Vatican’s Red Dance Troupe have since managed to keep the phenomenon camouflaged until recently; but their cardinal perversion has even more ancient origins rooted in the god-man human sacrificial worship of the gender-confused (see Sexology).
Being hyper-obsessed by our innate compulsion to pair, not a few theologians insist on presupposing a unsexed or androgynous pre-primordial fanciful creature called Adam-Kadmon.5 It seems its hoary gayness has lit the path for Alexander Dugin’s Fourth Way.6 Although other Adams and races likely exist, Genesis gives no indication that gender-ness existed before Adam’s rib-ectomy,7 Nor are bi- / homo- / or confused listed as divine attributions in any pre-primordial context that Adam could or should have reflected. Instead, the scriptural renditions we’ve inherited strongly and conveniently suggest that Eve was a divine afterthought. The phrase used to describe the creature from which both were derived is Eth ad Awdawm; a masculine term whose connotations include a clear-skinned creature with oxygenated blood. Moreover, but not to be taken lightly, after its division into two distinctly gendered but completely indevidual halves, God commanded both to ‘replenish’ the earth, suggesting that Earth had previously been ‘plenished’. To compound our accepted pool of ignorance, Genesis records two separate creation events we’ve no time to discuss here.
Some say our ancestors once walked and talked with the Ancient of Days during “days of eternity” (Micah.7.14), perhaps referring to the ‘Golden Age’ of all creation myths when sky, cosmic dust, and horizon melded all identities with transcendent goodness. We’ve since become profit-oriented, bottom-line business folks preoccupied with safety margins and YouTube ‘likes’. While some eat the real bread of communal grace, our majority gorges on “dust that covers the serpent’s bread”—which is likely not baked from the best of all possible dough (Isa.65.25). Jesus told his disciples to shake this dust off their feet (Matt.10.14) when folks refuse to discuss the Sphinx of vanishing horizons. Perhaps the serpent of Genesis is a figure-of-speech that represents our shadow’s lust for the dust of survival. Nonetheless, I am sure his suggestion that ‘You’re going to like being like G-d because then you can control all horizons’ — remains popular.
Disobeying G-d’s command not to go anywhere near that portal—at least not yet, Man & Mate Ltd. publicly entertained a forbidden tree in garden-central. Their newly acquired economic necessities and material proclivities soon caused them to become wholly invested in the business of ‘dust eating’ and excreting the wrong bread of communion. Having lost celestial grace while entertaining the delusion, they became vulnerable to innumerable unknowns even as neo-sapience evolved to cover this naked condition. Eventually they learned to follow the Dao of fitrah—that innate chora Kant called sensus communis. Over time they re-learned how to access sufficient strength to enjoy the bread of peaceful communal living by faithfully laboring to do what is best for their neighbors—beginning with spouses and offspring.
The Last Supper describes this formula of salvation. Indeed, the Son of Mary showed that the way forward is by ‘good deed doing’. He even predicted that some of us would do greater deeds than he (John.14.12). But no Christian has thus far ventured to say what could possibly be greater than saving all of humanity? I’m guessing, therefore, that the more authentic way of the cross is not human sacrifice, divine suicide, or ritual cannibalism.
note that the ascending body represents his church, those who will not be denied on the day of resurrection. https://uploads3.wikiart.org/images/salvador-dali/the-sacrament-of-the-last-supper-1955.jpg
Adam’s failed apotheosis after visiting forbidden ground in proscribed company provisionally arrested humankind’s development. Fixed on perceptions of dust-ridden fruit, the Paradise and G-d could not be found outside the experience of sublime sexual intimacy. They had also left the protection and company of the Celestial Church: ‘other trees’ in the now forbidden Garden. Those forests were divinely positioned to accompany and instruct them in the business of replenishing The Kingdom of God’s Cosmos (Matt 7:16) with good fruit. Their amnesia could only be cured by confirmed apostolic faith after Adam’s contrition. Nonetheless, being caught up by the conditioning of bad-fruit maelstroms, not a few nascent groups—including sons of gods and men (initiates and non-initiates, humans and humankind)—rejected the felicity of apostolic re-education. Left in the dark and duly exposed to beastly vulcanization and hunger, as well as the specter of organic chemistry and hordes of unclean mud suckers bent on rapine (seen and unseen (Ps.22.17; Q.17.88), their forgetfulness spawned the succession of full-grown political frenzies.
Although warned away from evil, many succumbed to disbelief and continued to act out the apotheosis deception; which in practice was no stroll through celestial gardens with well-appointed, trustworthy companions. Deprived of the relational complementarity owned by those who dwell in peace in the shade of The Tree Of Lives, reprobates always remain in need of everything elemental and subconsciously supernal; to include waste disposal and the operative knowledge of existential imperatives at corner cafes, with or without shisha. What’s more is that most errant love birds have ever since continued to to blame someone else for their self-imposed exile from the divine order that allows those who redeem shadowy qareens to live more abundantly..
G-d graciously protected the heaven(s) and all other firm places and countless suns from this church of the non-redeemable out of which few prove trustworthy. If I read scripture correctly, hominids, whom David and Isaiah called dust-eating wiggle worms (Ps.22.7; Isa.41.14), have had their curricula in exile severely and sternly modified by incarceration on a boggy firm place that had already been filled with Tolkien’s hordes. Divine plans for rescue were/are in place, pending first and second death tallies. Essentially, G-d set us free to play in a treacherous mud puddle (Eretz) to learn why we should make our beds before trying to define truth or colonize Mars. However, this time round, as my father once warned, “it’s a lesson learned the hard way”.
NOTES
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/2231998506/in/photostream/lightbox/
_____ these cube(s) represent universal/divine law upon which salvation depends because each ‘christ’ or ‘word-of-God within’ each of us must first die to Jung’s shadow in order to redeem what Al Quran calls the Qareen, after which it resurrects and becomes light per Allah’s command in Genesis.
3. See: Until The Eschaton Is Spent: https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/frdPkKR9pY
4. Votinov, M., Goerlich, K.S., Puiu, A.A. et al. Brain structure changes associated with sexual orientation. Sci Rep 11, 5078 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84496-z __ https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/ZwppJMV9mO
5. Adam-Kadmon: NB: Extracted from an essay: Crossing [out] Gender Boundaries by JD. Brey: https://is.gd/Inwtgc I recommend reading the complete essay. It illustrates the complex idiocy of Jewish Theology and explains their puritanical view of sexual relations, which, in turn, produces perverted preoccupations that plague the earth.
The task of homo religiosus is to restore the feminine to the masculine, to unite the two in a bond that overcomes gender differentiation by establishing the complete male who embodies masculine and feminine. Ontologically, there is only one gender in kabbalistic theosophy, for the female is part of the male… Jesus is a “transitional object” mediating between God and man for spiritually immature men and women who are unable to establish a more formal, mature, Jewish relationship with God; an unmediated relationship minus transitional object, meaning no transitional (traditional) mediator.
The quotation forms the bizarrely apropos idea that the phallus’ very existence appears extremely problematic, since its very appearance and being creates the gender dichotomy, the destruction of which is fancied a return to the idyllic realm of prelapsarian Eden (the androgynous man) …
The religious-man (homo-religiosus) is to return the feminine to the masculine,
to restore the original androgyny, appears to presuppose the removal of the phallus …
What would be a more fitting ritual or sign-creating act, to signify the fore-going (so to say),
than ritual circumcision, ritual emasculation, cutting and bleeding the transitional object,
which those not yet spiritually mature can’t bring themselves to dispense with?
In other words, those Jews who thought of themselves as having disposed of the transitional object (phallus) necessary only in the old covenant, the first covenant, the covenant for the immature, claimed their firstborn Jewish Messiah to be the first Jewish firstborn (peter rehem) born in a manner all the foregoing suggests (and even the foreskin suggests) is the very point of Abraham’s ritual circumcision: the elimination of the transitional object, the mediator of gender-dichotomy, which will, in the Kingdom age, ruled over by Messiah, come to an end: it (the transitional object) will be finished, will have birthed enough, its reign will be complete. The coupling of the masculine and feminine results in a unity that does not entail the androcentric restoration of the female to the male but a genuine sense of there being neither male nor female, that is, a model of androgyny that does not subject the feminine to the reign of the phallus.
~ Professor ER. Wolfson, Open Secret, p. 220.
The Jewish gnosis, as expressed in the Bahir and developed further in subsequent works of kabbalah, is predicated on a notion of redemption that signifies a return to an original unity in the divine Pleroma. In this unity, sexual differentiation is transcended, but only as a result of the feminine being absorbed into the masculine [Tantric Buddhism’s sacrifice of the dakini], and not because gender difference is completely obliterated so that there is neither male nor female, in the famous locution of Paul.
When Eve was still in Adam** death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being. If he enters again and attains his former self, death will be no more [Gospel of Philip (68:22-25)].
In a second passage from this work (70:10-20), it is again emphasized that the cause of death in the world was the separation of female from male, a remarkable rendering of the scriptural narrative of the sin of the first couple in the Garden of Eden. The task of Christ, accordingly, is “to repair the separation which was from the beginning” by joining together males and females in the bridal chamber.
~ ER Wolfson: Language, Eros, Being, p. 165
** Eve was never in Adam. She is a completely separate creation being… The scripture says ‘bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh’ — it does not say, ‘spirit of his spirit’ — they err.
6. Twilight of the Magicians: Aleksandr Dugin and the War Against the West, by JR Nyquist
EXCERPT: … members of Dugin’s Yuzhinskii Circle called themselves “The Black inspiration of Yurii Mamleev (b. 1931), a Russian mystic and novelist described as “a representative of the aesthetics of evil.”[vi] Just as Putin’s outward adoption of Russian Orthodoxy is a disguise, so was the adoption of Russian Orthodoxy by the Yuzhinskii Circle. As James Heiser’s research indicates, Dugin merely pays
lip service to Orthodoxy, but does not actually practice the religion. At the same time Dugin has adopted all the weapons of cultural Marxism. As he explained in his book, The Fourth Political Theory, “classical Marxists consistently call for insanity….”[vii] Turning to his own theory he added, “Madness is part of the gender arsenal of the Fourth Political Theory.”[viii]
Dugin, as an alleged Traditionalist, says that white European males are enemies of “Tradition” because white European males uphold liberalism (the First Political Theory). Therefore, noted Dugin, gender identity must be broken. Here Dugin sets up Western liberalism as a straw man, describing it as a Marxist would – as racism, sexism and classism. “Now we are in this moment of a postmodern re-extension,” wrote Dugin, “and the final breaking of gender. The stages of this break are feminism, homosexuality, sex change operations, and transhumanity.”[ix]
“We stand on the transition between the hyper-modern and the post-modern, and we do not know where the truth and reality lies.” Therefore, he continued, “in a post-modern construction of gender, there will not be any men.”[x] Remember how it was that Imran Hosein was this man’s favorite Alim
To destroy the order of being, Dugin advocates destroying the archetype of man. This archetype, he wrote, is falling to pieces. Conservatives can try though they may, but they cannot reconstruct “man” once he has been deconstructed. The only option will then be “androgyny as practiced by angels.”
Here we see that Dugin is a sorcerer putting ideas from various thinkers into a pot over which he repeats dark incantations like those of the weird sisters in Shakespeare’s Macbeth.