by dr o … an extract from Sexology Revised 2025
Those who hate manliness have the greatest identity slippage. ~ Kierkegaard
Marriage allows the doing of good deeds on a continuum per the two great commandments. Moreover, to optimize masculine and feminine identities with initiatory processing, all enduring relations institutions and human survival require the stability of clearly defined genders in conscious conjugation of all three loves (see Cardinality in THINGS THAT MATTER). These dynamics, in time, will construct the New Jerusalem of Salvador Dali’s famous Corpus Hypercubis to perfect, mating, support and protection of females and their offspring with universal communal approbation. This indicates compliance within natural boundaries —the cube representing universal laws— that vests the entire community with this responsibility.
Ditto for women. They both must attend to communal needs with an enthusiasm that transforms yin and yang impulses into convictions that inspire willful actions that see to mutual satisfaction, in and out of the bedroom, so that health is maintained for all and destiny becomes peacefully manifest in countenance and reputation. This is peace on earth. This magnificent scheme tolerates no play-acting or corrosive whimsy unless undermined by the tyranny that normalizes ignorance, deviancy, and injustice for gentile minions. Exactly how it is achieved is immaterial to the archetypical framework of balancing male-female dynamics … they simply are and must be dealt with as a matter of priority because they have everything to do with the validation of our innately constituted, gendered identity.
This clearly gendered identity kernel stochastically applies without deflation or risibility to all of us, and has to do with how and why we are to take ‘responsibility for the care, nurturing, welfare and protection of others. This concerns establishing the hierarchy of things that truly matter and is the real meaning and purpose of Islam’s haj.1 Even when unable to marry, it is best to subordinate one’s self to successful couples without squabbling or escaping the grace of their dopminion because their moral duty inherently embraces self-hood, purpose, and consequent eschatological outcomes.2
As predicate, pristine masculine development follows protocols for a standup male identity that even simians comprehend. A lesbian butch whose brain is masculinized3 similarly attends her lover. Male and female territorial frontiers are thus innately jury-rigged by the same Intellect that rigged nature and there is no wriggling away from this conclusion. In western societies, ritual acknowledgments of official LGBT identities do not exist except as aberrations of nature’s intent. Gays simply irrupt without warm welcomes so that Queer validation is anathema to social cohesion unless ritually dressed in terms that admit submission to the copestone of heterosexual hegemony. Indeed, occidentals have no rites of passage for mis-gendering outside of the ‘Mystery Religion’ context, which venues have managed to keep the phenomenon camouflaged until recently; and even this perversion has oriental origins.
Thus impaled by the divinely given compulsion to pair, some insist on presupposing a bisexual pre-primordial fanciful persona whom Jews dubbed Adam-Kadmon.i It is this ancient gay amalgam that lights the way to Alexander Dugin’s Fourth Way.ii Although other Adams and races likely exist, the Book of Genesis gives no indication that gender existed before Adam’s rib-ectomy, or that gender was a component of God in any pre-primordial transcendent context that Adam should reflect. Eve comes along almost as an afterthought in the Hebrew narrative. Albeit, their phrase, Eth ad Awdawm, has masculine connotations that refer to a corpuscular clear-skinned creature showing oxygenated blood. Moreover, and not to be taken lightly, God commanded them both to ‘replenish’ the earth, which indicates a previously ‘plenished’ earth. Moreover and in addition, there are two separate human creations described in Genesis we’ve no time for here.
Some say that humans once walked and talked with the Ancient of Days during days of eternity (Micah.7.14), perhaps referring to the ‘Golden Age’ mentioned in all creation myths, when sky, cosmic dust, and horizon melded all identities with transcendent goodness. But we’ve since become profit-oriented business folk preoccupied with safety margins and YouTube ‘likes’. While some eat the bread of life, which is the spirit of communal satisfaction, our majority gorges on the “dust that covers the serpent’s bread” —which is likely not baked from the best of all possible dough (Isa.65.25). Jesus even told his disciples to shake this dust off their feet (Matt.10.14) if folks refuse to discuss the Sphinx of vanishing horizons. It appears the serpent of Genesis is a figure-of-speech representing our lust for dust. Of course he exists and did suggest our apotheosis when he told Eve, ‘You’re going to like being like God because then you can control all horizons’ … or something to that effect.
Unfortunately, and likely prematurely, they ate from a tree that’s still in the garden. Out of necessity due to newfound proclivities, Man & Mate Ltd. (homosapiens) became wholly invested in ‘dust eating’ enterprises in one of God’s firm places (Earth) after disobeying a distinct command not to go anywhere near that gateway … at least not yet!
Having lost celestial grace they became vulnerable to things unknown, so that fear and uncertainty were new companions. Some of the more sapient later learned to follow the Dao of inborn fitrah, which is the innate chora Kant called sensus communis. In doing so they reacquired a taste for the bread of peaceful community living by faithfully laboring to do good for their neighbors — beginning with spouses and offspring. Christ’s last supper provides salvation’s formula (James.2.14-26). He showed his wayward Jewish brethren the way of good deed doing and predicted that some of them would do greater deeds than he (John.14.12), which should give everyone cause to rethink. after all, what could possibly be greater than saving all of humanity from hell? The path of salvation is surely the way of the cross, but not of human sacrifice or cannibalism.
After their failed apotheosis on forbidden grounds in proscribed company, Adam & Eve Ltd. were unable to directly perceive little more than dust-ridden fruit. Paradise and G-d were nowhere found and they could only recall a fading memory of Elysian waters and suns before evaginating into earth’s dust and morbid goo.
In addition to leaving G-d, they also left the protection and company of the Celestial Church — those ‘other trees’ in the now forbidden Garden who were divinely positioned to accompany and instruct them in the business of replenishing The Kingdom of God’s Cosmos (Matt 7:16) with good fruit. Caught in bad fruit maelstroms the insufficiently informed, nascent group we call Adam rejected the felicity of godly instruction. left in the dark and duly exposed to beasts, vulcanization, hunger, the specter of organic chemistry, and hordes of unclean mud suckers bent on rapine (seen and unseen (Ps.22.17; Q.17.88), they became uneasy.
Having been warned away from evil, they nonetheless succumbed to disbelief and acted on a lie. This new challenge was no stroll through Elysian gardens with well-appointed companions. Deprived of relational complementarity with the Tree Of Lives yet in need of everything elemental and supernal—to include waste disposal and operative knowledge of existential imperatives and corner cafes—they still required divine assistance for existence. Even so, our love birds still tried to blame someone else for their self-imposed exile from the divine order of living more abundantly.
G-d graciously protected heaven(s) and other firm places under countless suns from Adam’s ‘becoming homosapien-by-death’ hominids whom David and Isaiah called dust-eating wiggle worms (Ps 22:7; Isa 41:14). He modified our curricula by incarcerating us on a boggy firm place that was already filled with JR Tolkien’s hordes. Plans for rescue were in place pending first and second death tallies. Thus, G-d set us free to play in a treacherous mud puddle Jews call Eretz, just so we could learn why it is important to make our beds before we try to define the truth of things as they are. Only this time round it’s the hard way.
NOTES___________________
1. see my youtube lecture: Fixing Ramadan Parts I & II https://youtu.be/TtgXvAm3Okc
2. Until The Eschaton Is Spent. https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/frdPkKR9pY
3. Votinov, M., Goerlich, K.S., Puiu, A.A. et al. Brain structure changes associated with sexual orientation. Sci Rep 11, 5078 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84496-z
https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/ZwppJMV9mO
i.
Adam-Kadmon: The madness of Jewish theology
The task of homo religiosus is to restore the feminine to the masculine, to unite the two in a bond that overcomes gender differentiation by establishing the complete male who embodies masculine and feminine. Ontologically, there is only one gender in kabbalistic theosophy, for the female is part of the male… Jesus is a “transitional object” mediating between God and man for spiritually immature men and women, unable to establish a more formal, mature, Jewish relationship with God; an unmediated relationship, no transitional object, no transitional (traditional) mediator.
The quotation forms the bizarrely apropos idea that the phallus’ very existence appears extremely problematic, since its very appearance and being creates the gender dichotomy, the destruction of which is fancied a return to the idyllic realm of prelapsarian Eden (the androgynous man) … The religious-man (homo-religiosus) is to return the feminine to the masculine, to restore the original androgyny, appears to presuppose the removal of the phallus … What would be a more fitting ritual or sign-creating act, to signify the fore-going (so to say), then, (clearing throat). .. i.e., brit milah — ritual circumcision, ritual emasculation, cutting and bleeding the transitional object, which those not yet spiritually mature can’t bring themselves to dispense with? In other words, those Jews who thought of themselves as having disposed of the transitional object (phallus) necessary only in the old covenant, the first covenant, the covenant for the immature, claimed their firstborn Jewish Messiah to be the first Jewish firstborn (peter rehem) born in a manner all the foregoing suggests (and even the foreskin suggests) is the very point of Abraham’s ritual circumcision: the elimination of the transitional object, the mediator of gender-dichotomy, which will, in the Kingdom age, ruled over by Messiah, come to an end: it (the transitional object) will be finished, will have birthed enough, its reign will be complete. The coupling of the masculine and feminine results in a unity that does not entail the androcentric restoration of the female to the male but a genuine sense of there being neither male nor female, that is, a model of androgyny that does not subject the feminine to the reign of the phallus. ~ Professor ER. Wolfson, Open Secret, p. 220.
The Jewish gnosis, as expressed in the Bahir and developed further in subsequent works of kabbalah, is predicated on a notion of redemption that signifies a return to an original unity in the divine Pleroma. In this unity, sexual differentiation is transcended, but only as a result of the feminine being absorbed into the masculine [Tantric Buddhism’s sacrifice of the dakini], and not because gender difference is completely obliterated so that there is neither male nor female, in the famous locution of Paul.
When Eve was still in Adam** death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being. If he enters again and attains his former self, death will be no more [Gospel of Philip (68:22-25)].
In a second passage from this work (70:10-20), it is again emphasized that the cause of death in the world was the separation of female from male, a remarkable rendering of the scriptural narrative of the sin of the first couple in the Garden of Eden. The task of Christ, accordingly, is “to repair the separation which was from the beginning” by joining together males and females in the bridal chamber. ~ ER Wolfson: Language, Eros, Being, p. 165
NB: Extracted from an essay: Crossing [out] Gender Boundaries by JD. Brey: https://is.gd/Inwtgc I recommend reading the complete essay. It illustrates the complex idiocy of Jewish Theology and explains their puritanical view of sexual relations, which, in turn, produces perverted preoccupations that plague the earth.
** Eve was never in Adam. She was/is a completely separate creation and being… The scripture says ‘bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh’ — it does not say, ‘spirit of his spirit’—they err.
ii. Alexander Dugin
Twilight of the Magicians: Aleksandr Dugin and the War Against the West by JR Nyquist
EXCERPT: … members of Dugin’s Yuzhinskii Circle called themselves “The Black inspiration of Yurii Mamleev (b. 1931), a Russian mystic and novelist described as “a representative of the aesthetics of evil.”
[vi] Just as Putin’s outward adoption of
Russian Orthodoxy is a disguise, so was the adoption of Russian Orthodoxy by the Yuzhinskii Circle. As James Heiser’s research indicates, Dugin merely pays lip service to Orthodoxy, but does not actually practice the religion. At the same time Dugin has adopted all the weapons of cultural Marxism. As he explained in his book, The Fourth Political Theory, “classical Marxists consistently call for insanity….”[vii] Turning to his own theory he added, “Madness is part of the gender arsenal of the Fourth Political Theory.”
[viii]
Dugin, as an alleged Traditionalist, says that white European males are enemies of “Tradition” because white European males uphold liberalism (the First Political Theory). Therefore, noted Dugin, gender identity must be broken. Here Dugin sets up Western liberalism as a straw man, describing it as a Marxist would – as racism, sexism and classism. “Now we are in this moment of a postmodern re-extension,” wrote Dugin, “and the final breaking of gender. The stages of this break are feminism, homosexuality, sex change operations, and transhumanity.”
[ix]
“We stand on the transition between the hypermodern and the postmodern, and we do not know where the truth and reality lies.” Therefore, he continued, “in a post-modern construction of gender, there will not be any men.”
[x]
To destroy the order of being, Dugin advocates destroying the archetype of man. This archetype, he wrote, is falling to pieces. Conservatives can try though they may, but they cannot reconstruct “man” once he has been deconstructed. The only option will then be “androgyny as practiced by angels.” Here we see that Dugin is a sorcerer putting ideas from various thinkers into a pot over which he repeats dark incantations like those of the weird sisters in Shakespeare’s Macbeth.