Political Ponerology II: LENIN, The Paranoid, Bolshevik, Jewish Freemason

Editor’s Note:

Indeed, Lenin was all the above and more: a Jewish Bolshevik mass-murdering Freemason and thief (as was Trotsky) made cult hero, demigod and icon.  His body is still used to cast a spell which affects Russian and para-Russian commoners and bureaucrats alike with the awe of arrested spiritual and intellectual development; otherwise, if they were truly in their right minds, they would destroy it and burn the bloodied carcass.

As Muslims, we know the jinn love tombs, and the most powerful of jinn in the world are likely to be assigned to places like Westminster Abbey and Moscow’s architectural ode to evil (see: http://zaidpub.com/2013/12/16/the-secret-of-vladimir-lenins-mausoleum-the-teraphim/

Lenin died a madman (left), probably from syphilis, at the age of 53.  Yet his influence lingers and this is due far more to the natural course of human events when people reject the truth and cling to heroes and psychopaths such as this fellow, than it is from any witchcraft–although spells do have their influence, otherwise the damned fellow wouldn’t still be lying in state.  Read on and find out why it is that evil triumphs even over believers.

_____________________

FROM: Political Ponerology, pp 110-11

Paranoid  character  disorders:  It  is  characteristic  of  paranoid  behavior  for  people  to  be  capable  of  relatively  correct reasoning and discussion as long as the conversation involves minor  differences  of  opinion.  This  stops  abruptly  when  the partner’s arguments begin to undermine their overvalued ideas, crush their long-held stereotypes of reasoning, or forces them to accept a conclusion they had subconsciously rejected before. Such a stimulus unleashes upon the partner a torrent of pseudological, largely paramoralistic, often insulting utterances which
always contain some degree of suggestion.

Utterances like these inspire aversion among cultivated and logical  people,  who  then  tend  to  avoid  the  paranoid  types.  However,  the  power  of  the  paranoid  lies  in the  fact  that  they easily enslave less critical minds, e.g. people with other kinds of  psychological  deficiencies,  who  have  been  victims  of  the
egotistical  influence  of  individuals  with  character  disorders, and, in particular, a large segment of young people.

A  proletarian  may  perceive  this  power  to  enslave  to  be  a kind of victory over higher-class people and thus take the paranoid  person’s  side.  However,  this  is  not  the  normal  reaction among the common people, where perception of psychological reality occurs no less often than among intellectuals.

In sum then, the response of accepting paranoid argumentation is qualitatively more frequent in reverse proportion to the civilization  level  of  the  community  in  question,  although  it never  approaches  the  majority.  Nevertheless,  paranoid  individuals  become  aware  of  their  enslaving  influence  through
experience and attempt to take advantage of it in a pathologically egotistic manner.

We know today that the psychological mechanism of paranoid  phenomena  is  twofold:  one  is  caused  by  damage  to  the brain  tissue,  the  other  is  functional  or  behavioral.  Within  the above-mentioned  process  of  rehabilitation,  any  brain-tissue lesion causes a certain slackening of accurate thinking and, as a
consequence,  of  the  personality  structure.  Most  typical  are those cases caused by an aggression in the diencephalon

[The posterior division of the forebrain; connects the cerebral hemispheres with the mesencephalon; the region of the brain that includes the epithalamus, thalamus, and hypothalamus]

by various  pathological  factors,  resulting  in  its  permanently  decreased tonal ability, and similarly of the tonus of inhibition in the brain cortex. Particularly during sleepless nights, runaway thoughts give rise to a paranoid changed view of human reality, as well as to ideas which can be either gently naive or violently revolutionary.

Let us call this kind paranoid characteropathy.  In  persons  free  of  brain  tissue  lesions,  such  phenomena most frequently occur as a result of being reared by people with paranoid characteropathia, along with the psychological terror of their childhood. Such psychological material is then assimilated  creating  the  rigid  stereotypes  of  abnormal  experiencing.

This makes it difficult for thought and world view to develop normally, and the terror-blocked contents become transformed into permanent, functional, congestive centers. Ivan Pavlov comprehended all kinds of paranoid states in a manner similar to this functional model without being aware of this basic and primary cause. He nevertheless provided a vivid description  of  paranoid  characters  and  the  above-mentioned ease with which paranoid individuals suddenly tear away from factual discipline and proper thought-processes.

Those readers of  his  work  on  the  subject  who  are  sufficiently  familiar  with Soviet conditions glean yet another historical meaning from his little book. Its intent appears obvious. The author dedicated his work, with no word of inscription, of course, to the chief model of a paranoid  personality:  the  revolutionary  leader  Lenin, whom the scientist knew well. As a good psychologist, Pavlov could predict that he would not be the object of revenge, since the  paranoid  mind  will  block  out  the  egocentric  associations.  He was thus able to die a natural death.

Lenin should nevertheless be included with the first and most characteristic kind  of paranoid  personality,  i.e.  most probably due to diencephalic  brain damage.  Vassily Grossman [see note below]  describes him more or less as follows:

Lenin was always tactful, gentle, and
polite, but simultaneously characterized
by an excessively sharp, ruthless, and
brutal attitude to political opponents. He
never allowed any possibility that they might be even minimally right, nor that
he might be even minimally wrong.

He would often call his opponents huck-
sters, lackeys, servant-boys, mercenar-
ies, agents, or Judases bribed for thirty
pieces of silver. He made no attempt to
persuade his opponents during a dis-
pute. He communicated not with them,
but rather with those witnessing the
dispute, in order to ridicule and com-
promise his adversaries. Sometimes
such witnesses were just a few people,
sometimes thousands of delegates to a
congress, sometimes millions worth
throngs of newspaper readers.

_____________

NOTES:

Vassily Grossman was a Soviet citizen, a Ukrainian Jew born in 1905. A Communist, he became a war correspondent, working for the army paper Red Star – a job which took him to the front lines of Stalingrad and ultimately to Berlin. He was among the first to see the results of the death camps, and published the first account of a death camp – Treblinka – in any language.

After the war, he seems to have lost his faith. He wrote his immense novel, Life and Fate (Zhizn i Sudba) in the 1950s and – in the period of the Krushchev thaw, which had seen Alexander Solzhenitsyn allowed to publish A Dayon the Life of Ivan Denisovich – he submitted the manuscript to a literary journal in 1960 for publication. But Solzhenitsyn was one thing, Grossman another: his manuscript was confiscated, as were the sheets of carbon paper and typewriter ribbons he had used to write it. Suslov, the Politbureau member in charge of ideology, is reported as having said it could not be publishedfor 200 years. However, it was smuggled out on microfilm to the west by Vladimir Voinovich, and published, first in France in 1980, then in English in 1985.
Why the 200 year ban? Because Life and Fate commits what was still, in a ‘liberal’ environment, the unthinkable sin of arguing for the moral equivalence of Nazism and Soviet communism.