“The machiavelian threefold game of the neoconservatives”.
I cannot recommend this highly enough. Professor Guyénot has succinctly summarized recent history in light of the Israeli cum Zionist madness that possess the USA and is destroying the earth and its peoples. DO NOT MISS THIS. – oz
Adam Weishaupt Aleister Crowley America Ashkenazi Bolshevism Catholic China CIA corruption Covid Donmeh Egypt Freemasonry Freemasons Holocaust Human Sacrifice Idolatry Illuminati Iran Isis Israel Jacob Frank Jerusalem Jesuits Jews LGBT Lies Malaysia Marriage Moses Muslim Brotherhood NWO Palestine pedophilia Pharaoh Rothschild Rothschilds Russia Satanism Stalin Syria Turkey Vaccines Vatican Zionism
2 responses to ““The machiavelian threefold game of the neoconservatives””
brother omar…i agree with your view that this a an excellent evidenced based profile of the deception and destruction of mankind for ego-maniacal reasons…thanks brother..take care
If any leader of any nation is adopting any of the Western political systems as it’s model form of governance,then that particular leader and goverment falls under suspicion of collaborating with the ponerocracy of evil that is currently administering the world.
Niccolo Machiavelli has been described by some commentators as the father of the “politics model” of political science or so they tell us.Machiavelli argues that even the practice of malevolence should be considered if it helps to create and preserve a glorious regime.
Interesting to note that the expansion of the scientific paradigm during the Enlightenment further pushed the study of politics beyond normative determinations.Politics is considered as an observational and not an experimental science or so they say.Due to this,political scientists have historically observed political elites,institutions,and individual or group behaviour in order to identify patterns,draw generalizations,and build theories of politics.
So,which type of question should we asked here?.Can something or someone be observed without firstly being experimented on?.Or can an experiment on something or someone be conducted without observation?.
In fact,the designation “political scientists” is typically for those with a doctorate in the field.
Integrating political studies of the past into a unified discipline is ongoing,and the history of political science has provided a rich field for the growth of both normative and positive political science,with each part of the discipline sharing some historical ‘predecessors’.
With the abundance of modifications,additions,corrections and substitutions done to fine tune the whole political system from the past till the present,it seems that not even a single political system out of the plethora of systems which is available,is capable to reach the pinnacle of political perfection,that could guarantee the needs and rights of all mankind.
So,this in turn becomes the observational science of political chaos.Leaders who willed such systems will consequently be versatilely oppressive to it’s own citizens.It seems to me that it is the philosophy of ‘pretext’ which is at work.