By Omar Zaid, M.D.
The unrestrained urban sprawls that have reached synonymy with ‘civilization’ are havens of impunity and anonymity for organized gangs of conditioned sociopaths whether in street or Penthouse. [i] While these predators engage in un-restrained appetite satisfaction along with the absurdity of relative values, their rentier arrogance [2] is touted by Globalists imbued with imaginaries that dilute the naturally sound social forces of communal cohesion. They pound Caesar’s drum and march onward with cute slogans like ‘One Malaysia’, ‘One World’ ‘One Jerusalem’ etc., adding fabricated catchphrases such as Madame Clinton’s oxymoronic “Global Village” to caravans of cultural ‘Terminators’. Ibn Khaldun referred to these “myths of authenticity” as the fascist propaganda that popularly holds sway over the hoi polloi and ultimately destroys its targeted polity. It accomplishes this by way of the fallacious metaphysical constructs that demean human rights in favor of levies and laws that enrich its parasitic fabricators — historically priests and kings. And as it erodes morals, ethics, righteous ambition, individual rewards (think inflation) and cultural identity, it alters the human estate of personal satisfaction either towards mounting frustration or impossibly satiable hedonism–perhaps both, depending on one’s moral vs immoral perspective.
The Empire preys on our kids using all the tools at its disposal: Economic panic, high college tuition, high unemployment and a mythology that the U.S. has some existential right to steal the resources of other nations. – Cindy Sheehan (anti-war activist), 2008.
These myths are touted by well paid rhetoricians and mimics whose minds have been closed to sound reason by Tavistokian professionals[iii] of the Fabian mold.[iv] In the ‘time-honored’ name of the Jacobin ‘Liberty’,[v]the siren’s call to ‘free trade’ favors Orwell’s [a British Spy] masters of the craft, and methodically fulfills the prophecies of H. G. Wells and Ann Rand with a sociopath’s dispassion. If you fail to follow my reasoning, it’s most likely because your worldview has been harnessed by extremely competent methods that simultaneously control both public opinions and academic discourses while authentic history is rescinded by recensions that favor myths of origin and intent. What is worse is that academics universally subscribe to dubious funding and are habituated to ‘White Tower” prestige like most addicts; hence, they’ve learned not to rock the life-boat of conformism.[vi] This is far from the position of the Muslim zuhudi who is a cosmopolitan detached from the world and yet commands his or her purview; as did Nur ad-Din, Sala’u’din and other righteous Caliphs and Sultans of righteous dominion. When you’ve recovered from the offense, I suuggest you reject the common herd mentality that permits the Hidden Hand of Iblissian sociopaths their repeated victories; especially the butchery that marked the 20th Century and has so far introduced the 21st with its star-crossed, psychopathic, Jacobin preambles for “liberty, democracy and freedom.”
“Satanism begins with atheism. We begin with the universe and say, “It’s indifferent. There’s no God, there’s no Devil. No one cares!” So you then have to make a decision that places yourself at the center of your own subjective universe, because of course we can’t have any kind of objective contact with everything that exists. That’s rather arrogant and delusional . . . “I’m looking for humanity to have a secular, pluralistic culture. People should be able to follow whatever fantasies or religions they want, as long as they don’t impose them on other people and force other people into doing things based upon whatever kind of holy writ they have.” – P. Gilmore
The following illustrations show this ubiquitous icon (pentagram) adorning pennants of Nationalism, Democracy and Liberty. As you gaze on the cold hearted signs of mankind’s enemy, be mindful that this same icon also marked the discomfited dames and sires of those who remain faithful to Chairman Mao’s legacy of demerit. The utilization of this so-called “star” is pure sorcery since all stars are spherical, and neither are the illustrated colors employed by our pathocrats a mere happenstance.
What profit remains for waning cultures that entertain the siren star of Freemasonic flush or the papaist dialogues that ignore differences God has set between nations and creeds? Cultures that favor and defer to these iconographic pennants and red-sashed ecumenicists of Gnosticism[i] are given over to evangelical, fifth columnists who invite citizens to obey the red and white clad hierophants of the Knights of Malta, all of whom take an oath of loyalty to the Roman Papacy. The lads and lassies of this gang comprise an army; one which Suleiman the Great attempted to exterminate even after casting them out of the Levant. [vii] Indeed, what has the five starred “United Nations” done except foster star-struck identity registers while genocide and dearth multiply under its ever hesitant watch? The several pipers and sycophants of this and other institutional ploys have lured and fashioned the earth’s peoples into mongrelized condiments for the larders of Rome, NYC, London and DC; stacking them up like so many cookie-cut dominoes. This fact of post-Colonial heritage belies the present illusions of cultural identity as each nation parades its bemused citizens to Wall Street’s processors under the auspice of economic hit men[viii]and World finance facilities owned, operated and manipulated by internationalist felons, many of whom are Knights of Malta. [ix]
As we all should know, the best way to rob a bank meant to preserve the wealth of nations is to own it [x], manage it, or at least marry the commissioner’s daughter. And the best way to misguide a nation is to pose as authentic leadership—sub-human pagans for whom Bal’am supplicated against the will of his donkey (who had better sense); a man and nation whom Allah swt likened to dogs in Al’Qur’an. Hence, the writer proposes that it is time for cogent men and women of common sense, scholarship, acumen and integrity to put a stop to the insanity of denying these facts of post-modernity for the sake of the constituencies under their charge.
Although the South Korean Flag (Taegeukgi, at left) is free of the cult’s subsuming imagery its Coat of Arms is not. Despite its rising commercial success, S. Korea’s society is rife with the demoralizing influences of the Hegelian dialectic that has reduced its people to “right” and “left” imaginaires. This ancient Roman tactic is a Kabalist rite of passage for initiates of upper degree Illuminati members. Its polarizations are utilized to divide any nation into readily managed sheep-pens. Simply put, it is a magician’s trick that erodes the sincere consciousness of a people’s authentic identity; a consciousness that is indelibly bound to singular cultures. The homogenized brew of “Right” and “Left” partisanship is a far cry from the Taoist Heritage of balance that is symbolized by S. Korea’s wizened ensign. Nevertheless, it seems that not a few Koreans have awakened from the trance inducing propaganda and view Uncle Sam’s starred top hat–rather than northern cousins–as the real and present danger. On inauguration, S. Korean President Roh Moo-hyun said, ‘I will be a president who says “no” to the US’ reflecting the then popular consensus. This stirring summons emits a spirit of hope for which Lao Tse would surely smile. It calls forth the ideal of good neighborly behavior for which the Master’s master would no doubt applaud as Japan seeks partnership in lieu of the Imperialism that brought its downfall and revision in Uncle Sam’s image. The recent Iraqi incursion on Korea’s moment of clarity is ephemeral, and reactionary Islamophobia is a major theme this writer intends to halt in favor of regional reconciliations that will restore honor, authenticity and autonomous prosperity to rulers and ruled, with a view to reconstruct an identitarian consciousness that is free of alien star-crossed imaginaires something impossible to do without acknowledging and acting on the truth contained within these few pages.
N. Korea’s Kaesong was once a haven for Muslim traders and artisans and even boasted a mosque during the 9th century CE. Ironically, it is now a sanctuary for Lucifer’s neo-capitalism and no doubt needs revisiting by authentic pilgrims of truth. Monetary oriented economics is quickly becoming a post-modern casualty in light of a another well engineered global economic recession. Sustainability is the new Phoenix upon whose wings the region must rise in order to survive without eating each other. In this realty show, imagined Stalinist, Maoist or Capitalist starlight has no place, as the PD (People’s Democracy) and Kim Il-Sung’s Jucheist parties discovered when the Iron Curtain fell on their well-splintered illusion as it was buffeted by the currency assault on Asian economies a decade ago. The balm that can heal this pitiful fragmentation is the revitalization of the region’s Taoist, Zen Buddhist, Confucian and Islamic roots, and these are in addition to traditions peculiar to communal cultures in conjunction with a profoundly successful feudal historicity that was systematically destroyed by the Jesuits. For this purpose, there is little need for Yankee-Doodle rhetoric, and absolutely no room to ponder Christian fantasies of a Pax-Romana from Jerusalem or Anglo-Germanic holy grails; and neither should lessons from Britain’s War of Roses[xi] nor those of comrades Mao, Stalin, Castro, MacArthur and other counter-Reformation agents such as Hitler and Croatia’s genocidal Ustashi [xii] have any bearing on this effort, other than to act as signposts warning of mortal danger in order to stand against the Romanist plague.
Regional cultural revivalism is antithetical to applied Marxism as well as the Fascist proclivities of Neo-liberalism or neo-con imperialism as financed and directed by Rothschild cronies or Bilderberger Synarchists [xiii]and their several well-heeled ‘Tax Exempt’ Foundations. The reader will come to realize that what the Middle East, the East and Southeast Asia require is post-hegemonic regionalism rather than any New World Order of consensus builders vis-à-vis the post-Cold War opera conducted by the same cult that stocked pre- / pan- and post-cold war armamentariums physically and metaphysically.
Thoughtful inquiry transcends borders while keeping them intact and free of hegemonic intrusions from the ‘other’ as long as one holds respect for both as either beneficent friend or hostile enemy. The true cosmopolitan tenaciously holds on to both the courage and discipline that authentic cultural identity endows. It is towards lifting human dignity, an estate that is sacrosanct to Islamic, Zen Buddhist and Taoist principles and ethics that this writer directs your attention, and this in sharp contradistinction to the Secular Humanism that has led British and Australian gendarmes to march in defense of gay policemen and protect public fornication. Nevertheless, if this is what your leaders and people desire on the streets and in the minds of your Capitals and charges–they are already on your entertainment venues–then by all means, deny this effort any contemplation, return to your Star-Crossed iniquity, and may Allah have mercy on us.
[i] “99% of sociopaths are fully integrated members of society who are completely dead inside… Their only function on this earth to manipulate and destroy the rest of us. Psychopaths are social predators who charm, manipulate and ruthlessly plow their way through life, leaving a broad trail of broken hearts, shattered expectations and empty wallets. Completely lacking in conscience and feelings for others, they selfishly take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without the slightest sense of guilt or regret.”
Robert D. Hare, Ph.D., Without Conscience
“A sociopath has no conscience, no emotional attachment to others, and no ability to love… life is reduced to a contest, and other human beings seem to be nothing more than game pieces, to be moved about, used as shields or ejected.”
Martha Stout, Ph.D., The Sociopath Next Door
“Since the entire cerebral cortex of a sociopath is almost never at a normal level of alertness (their waking brain waves resemble the waves of a normal person in a light sleep, alpha waves). Some of the basic mental and emotional skills the rest of the world takes so for granted never develop, and crucial among these is the thing called conscience. That one never develops at all. Sociopaths do not need it.”
Labyrinth of the Psychopath, David Icke
This abbreviated introduction to Sociopathy describes the worldview of the Talmudist as well as most of our Political and corporate leadership, not to mention Satanists of the Left Hand Path. In addition, the trance like state of consciousness is similar to that which is induced by watching TV. – oz
[ii] The Rentier Mentality
Rentier theory makes a distinction between ‘earned’ and ‘unearned’ income, according to Yates, and assumes that a rentier economy creates a specific mentality. The economic behavior of a rentier is distinguished from conventional economic behavior ‘in that it embodies a break in the work-reward causation.’” (Yates, p. 21.) “Rewards of income and wealth for the rentier do not come as the result of work but rather are the result of chance or situation.” Mahdavy observed a complacent attitude among the rentier states, which contrasted vividly with the sense of alarm and urgency prevalent in most other underdeveloped countries with massive impoverishment of the general populace and general backwardness.
Mahdavy wrote, “Whereas in most underdeveloped countries, this kind of relative regression will normally lead to public alarm and some kind of political explosion aimed at changing the status quo”…in a rentier state, the welfare and prosperity imported from abroad “preempts some of the urgency for change and rapid growth” and may in fact coincide with “socio-political stagnation and inertia.” (Yates, p. 21.)
The rentier mentality is a “psychological condition with profound consequences for productivity: contracts are given as an expression of gratitude rather than as a reflection of economic rationale; civil servants see their principal duty as being available in their offices during working hours; businessmen abandon industry and enter into real-estate speculation or other special situations associated with a booming oil sector; the best and brightest abandon business and seek out lucrative government employment; manual labor and other work considered demeaning by the rentier is farmed out to foreign workers, whose remittances flood out of the rentier economy; and so on. In extreme cases income is derived simply from citizenship.” (Yates, p. 22)
Biot Report #227: June 23, 2005;
The Suburban Emergency Management Project (SEMP) Cook County, Illinois.
[iii] Re: Tavistock:
“The English control of this world movement is demonstrated by the ideology of American foundations, which is created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the “breaking point” of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese. Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London, because its prophet, Sigmund Freud, settled here in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of “controlling” humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personnel are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations.
A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network. Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a “refugee”, the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let [their] Special Operations Executive control U.S. polices.
All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal – to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. [These are Talmudic principles..]
A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy – the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, directed by Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, in which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like guinea pigs, resulted in several deaths … The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed lysergic acid. Roosevelt’s advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD “counter-culture” of the 1960s, the “student revolution”, which was financed by $25 million from the CIA … Today, the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 billion a year network of foundations in the U.S., all of it funded by U.S. taxpayers’ money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks …”
Dr. Eustace Mullins, PhD, Research Fellow, Library of Congress,
The World Order – A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism; pp 332-4
[iv] “One of the most interesting episodes of the French Revolution was that known as the Conspiracy of Babeuf. Babeuf formed the Society of the Pantheon which, according to Prof. Laski, was operated by a secret committee of direction. Among them were Darthe, Marechal, Germain and Buinarotti their historian. Their brand of communism favored the theory that the poor could not help themselves or improve their position, that the rich must be suppressed and that the ideal state could only be reached by class war and a dictatorship of the proletariat led by Babouvists. Laski compares its postulates to Bolshevism. The Babouvists, though suppressed by the Directory in 1796, survives today [1933] having successfully penetrated an English Literary Society called the Fabians, where its predatory principles pass for Socialism.”
N. Webster, Secret Societies – Lady Queensborough, Occult Theocracy, p. 382-3;
also see: Harold J. Laski, The Socialist Tradition in the French Revolution, and the Autobiography of Wolfe Tone
[v]See: Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism (written in French, but translated into English and first published in 1798-1799) is a book by the French Jesuit, the Abbé Augustin Barruel.
In the book, Barruel claims that the French Revolution was the result of a deliberate conspiracy or plot to overthrow the throne, altar and aristocratic society in Europe. The plot was allegedly hatched by a coalition of philosophes, Freemasons, and the Order of the Illuminati. The conspirators created a system that was inherited by the Jacobins who operated it to its greatest potential. The Memoirs purports to expose the Revolution as the culmination of a long history of subversion. Barruel was not the first to make these charges but he was the first to present them in a fully developed historical context and his “evidence” was on a quite unprecedented scale. Barruel wrote each of the first three volumes of the book as separate discussions of those who contributed to the conspiracy. The fourth volume is an attempt to unite them all in a description of the Jacobins in the French Revolution. Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism is representative of the criticism of the Enlightenment that spread throughout Europe during the Revolutionary period. Barruel’s Memoirs is considered one of the founding documents of the right-wing interpretation of the French Revolution.
Amos Hofman, “Opinion, Illusion, and the Illusion of Opinion: Barruel’s Theory of Conspiracy,
” Eighteenth Century Studies Vol. 27 No. 1 (1993), 28.
[vi] “Why I Got Fired From Teaching American History”
By Thaddeus Russell; 19 Oct 2010, Huffington Post
Five years ago, I had every reason to believe that my job as a history professor at Barnard College was secure. I had been teaching there for four years, I had published my dissertation with a major publisher, and because I had tripled the sizes of the introductory U.S. history course and the American Studies program, colleagues told me they “would be shocked” if I were not promoted to a tenure-track position. But that was before my colleagues knew what I was teaching.
I had always been a misfit in academia, partly because of my background, partly because of my personality, and increasingly over the years because of my ideas — ideas that are now a book called “A Renegade History of the United States.” I was raised by pot-smoking, nudist, socialist revolutionaries as an egghead white boy in black neighborhoods in Berkeley and Oakland. I nearly flunked eighth grade and finished high school with a C average. Then I went to the anarchist, ultra-hippy Antioch College in Ohio, which accepted all their applicants, didn’t give grades, and didn’t have a history department.
So even though I managed to pull myself out of that background and into and through Columbia for a PhD, then onto a job at an elite college, I was highly uncomfortable moving from the world of weed to the world of tweed. I hated being “Professor.” I cursed in class. I talked about sex. I used politically incorrect terms. My students said they had never heard the things I was teaching them in class. They called me “Bad Thad.” I showed them that during the American Revolution drunkards, laggards, prostitutes, and pirates pioneered many of the freedoms and pleasures we now cherish — including non-marital sex, interracial socializing, dancing, shopping, divorce, and the weekend — and that the Founding Fathers, in the name of democracy, opposed them. I argued not only that many white Americans envied slaves but also that they did so for good reason, since slave culture offered many liberating alternatives to the highly repressive, work-obsessed, anti-sex culture of the early United States. I demonstrated that prostitutes, not feminists, won virtually all the freedoms that were denied to women but are now taken for granted. By tracing the path of immigrants from arrival as “primitives” to assimilation as “civilized” citizens, I explained that white people lost their rhythm by becoming good Americans. I presented evidence that without organized crime, we might not have jazz, Hollywood, Las Vegas, legal alcohol, birth control, or gay rights, since only gangsters were willing to support those projects when respectable America shunned them.
This was not the standard left-liberal perspective my students had heard, and it certainly wasn’t a conservative one, either. It was informed by an unlikely mix of influences, including the hippies and other cultural radicals I had encountered in my early life, black and gay cultures that showed me a way out of the self-imposed limitations of being white and straight, and libertarians who caused me to question the commitment to freedom among the left that I had been born into and which employed me as a professor. I gave my students a history that was structured around the oldest issue in political philosophy but which professional historians often neglect – the conflict between the individual and community, or what Freud called the eternal struggle between civilization and its discontents. College students are normally taught a history that is the story of struggles between capitalists and workers, whites and blacks, men and women. But history is also driven by clashes between those interested in preserving social order and those more interested in pursuing their own desires — the “respectable” versus the “degenerate,” the moral versus the immoral, “good citizens” versus the “bad.” I wanted to show that the more that “bad” people existed, resisted, and won, the greater was what I called “the margin of freedom” for all of us.
My students were most troubled by the evidence that the “good” enemies of “bad” freedoms were not just traditional icons like presidents and business leaders, but that many of the most revered abolitionists, progressives, and leaders of the feminist, labor, civil rights, and gay rights movements worked to suppress the cultures of working-class women, immigrants, African Americans, and the flamboyant gays who brought homosexuality out of the closet.
I had developed these ideas largely on my own, in my study and in classrooms, knowing all the while that I was engaged in an Oedipal struggle to overthrow the generation of historians who came of age during the 1960s and 1970s, controlled academic history, and had trained me. They were so eager to make the masses into heroes that they did not see that it was precisely the non-heroic and unseemly characteristics of ordinary folks that changed American culture for the better.
So I was quite anxious when I was asked to present my work to colleagues in order to get a long-term contract and be moved into line for a shot at tenure. A friend in the history department told me that given my publishing record and popularity among students the talk would be “really just a formality.” But I knew it would be trouble.
Several distinguished professors from Columbia showed up, since the university has final say on all tenure decisions at its sister college, Barnard. During my talk, a Columbia professor who had been named by a national magazine as the most important public intellectual in the United States, stared at me with what I took — rightly, it turned out — to be disgust. Another walked out before I finished. One of my graduate school advisors asked a series of hostile questions. Other colleagues told me after the talk that I was “courageous,” that I was “wonderfully, relentlessly revisionist,” and that I made some famous historians “look like dinosaurs.”
But emails came into the hiring committee from “important places,” I was told, calling my ideas “improper,” “frightening,” and “dangerous.” They said my ideas had no place in the academy and insisted that I be terminated. It was simply not okay for me to describe the “oppressed” in the terms used by their oppressors — “shiftless,” “sexually unrestrained,” “primitive,” “uncivilized” — even though my argument transformed those epithets into tributes.
After I was told that I would be leaving Barnard, hundreds of students protested in faculty and deans’ offices and the Columbia Spectator devoted an editorial to my case, but to no avail. There did indeed seem to be no place for me in the academy. And so I wrote a book.
[vii] In the very early 1990s, just as the last vestiges of the Soviet Empire were crumbling into oblivion, a friend – member of the KGB counter intelligence apparatus – during an intimate dinner told me of a very powerful and secretive organization known as the Bildebergers. Behind this secret society is a contemporary network of powerful private merchant-banking interests of the medieval Venetian financier-oligarchic model known as fondi. British and Dutch East India Companies, the forerunners of the Council of the 300 and the Bildebergers, are examples of these private merchant banks. Their final objective is a post-industrial society. Actually, their real name is Synarchists. “Synarchism” is used to define a new concept of political alliances by an international brotherhood of financiers and industrialists through a unity of the socialists and the anarchists on fascist principles. According to a top secret 18 page French military intelligence report dated July 1941, summarizing a 100-page dossier on the French Synarchist groups:
“The Synarchist movement’s aim is essentially to overthrow in every country where they exist, the parliamentary regimes which are considered insufficiently devoted to the interests of these groups and, therefore, too difficult to control because of the number of persons required to control them.”
Therefore, it is not too difficult to understand that the intention behind each and all of the Bilderberg meetings is how to create a Synarchist “Aristocracy of Purpose” between Europe and the United States, and how to come to agreement on questions of policy, economics, and strategy in jointly ruling the world. NATO was their crucial base of operation and subversion because it afforded them the backdrop for their plans of [perpetual war].
From An interview with Daniel Estulin (excerpts)
Author of La Verdadera Historia del Club Bilderberg,
Editorial Planeta, S. A., 2005, 2009;Diagonal, 662-664, 08034 Barcelona, ISBN 84-8453-157-0
[viii] The phrase Sub Rosa comes from the Latin and means ‘under the rose’ or confidentiality. The rose was the emblem of the god Horus in ancient Egypt. Later the Greeks and Romans regarded this as god of silence. This originates from a Greek/Roman misinterpretation of an Egyptian hieroglyphic adopting Horus along with Isis and Osiris as a God. The Greeks translated his Egyptian name Her – pa – khrad to Harpocrates. Cupid gave Harpocrates a rose as a token of gratitude for not betraying the mother of Cupid, Venus. Among the Freemasons the rose is the symbol of silence.
[ix] Croatian: Ustaša – Hrvatski Revolucionarni Pokret, members known collectively as Ustaše, but sometimes anglicised as Ustashe, Ustashas or Ustashi) was a Croatian fascist anti-Yugoslav separatist movement. The ideology of the movement was a blend of fascism, Nazism, Croatian ultra-nationalism, and Roman Catholic Clericalist Fundamentalism. The movement emphasized the need for a racially “pure” Croatia and promoted persecution and genocide against Serbs, Jews and Roma people (Gypsies).
1. Palmer Domenico, Roy. Encyclopedia of Modern Christian Politics. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0313323623
2. Viktor Meier. Yugoslavia: a history of its demise. English edition. London, England, UK: Routledge, 1999 Pp. 125.
3. Bernd Jürgen Fischer (ed.). Balkan strongmen: dictators and authoritarian rulers of South Eastern Europe. Purdue University Press, 2007. Pp. 207.
Haj Amin al Husseini was appointed Grand Mufti by one of the Pope’s court Jews, England’s acting Lord High Commissioner for Palestine, Herbert Samuel. He went on to reside in Nazi Germany for four years (1941-1945) aiding and abetting Rome’s Nazi SS/Croatian Ustachi-led crusade against the Jews and Orthodox Christians of what had been “pan-Slav” Yugoslavia, created by the iniquitous Versailles Treaty.”
See: Pierre van Paassen (1895 – 1968) ; Days of Our Years
[x] In the Gnostic theology of Athanasius, only ascetics were considered the Bride of Christ, a pernicious teaching which influenced many devout Christians to seek Christ in monasteries and convents. Although the religious orders had the outward appearance of spiritual piety, they were often, however, fronts for occult as well as homosexual and lesbian activity… It was through the establishment of monasteries that the Merovingian Jews, whose forefathers were the Alexandrian Gnostics, began to infiltrate and mold the theology and practices of the Roman Catholic Church. Many of the popes were Merovingian monks who forced masses of European Jews to convert to Roman Catholicism., with the result that the Church incorporated traditions from Judaism, the Talmud and Kabbalah… In the thoroughly pagan milieu of Alexandria, an Egyptian priest and magus by the name of Ormesius founded the monastic Society of Ormus. The members of this society included the Therapeutae of Alexandria and the Essenes of Qumran: “the founder of the Rosicrucians was one Ormesius,[i] who had been converted by St. Mark, at Alexandria, in A.D. 46. He purified the Egyptian Rites, and reconciled them with Christianity, carrying his disciples with him, and founded the Society of ORMUS, or of the Light, each member wearing a Red Cross[hence Red Movement]. To this society Essenes and Therapeutae joined themselves to conserve what became the Masonic [Gnostic] Secrets.”
Antiquities of the Illuminati, “The Johannite Legend of the Templars” by Baron de Westerode.
Author’s Note: Here we have the origin of the Priory de Sion, rooted in ancient Egyptian Mysteries. These are the Hermetic Magi who now rule the world:
“When a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar. On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colors, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words IUSTUM, NECAR, REGES, IMPIOUS. The meaning of which is: It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments, or Rulers. Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and then addresses the postulant:”
Burke McCarty, The Suppressed Truth about Lincoln’s Assassination; pp 12-14
[xi] The Siege of Malta (also known as the Great Siege of Malta) took place in 1565 when the Ottoman Empire invaded the island, then held by the Knights Hospitaller (also known as the Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, Knights of Malta, Knights of Rhodes, and Chevaliers of Malta). The Knights won the siege, one of the bloodiest and most fiercely contested in history, and one which became one of the most celebrated events in sixteenth century Europe. Voltaire said, “Nothing is more well known than the siege of Malta,” and it unquestionably put an end to the European perception of Ottoman invincibility and marked a new phase in Spanish domination of the Mediterranean. The siege was the climax of an escalating contest between a Christian alliance and the Ottoman Empire for control of the Mediterranean, a contest that included Turkish corsair Turgut Reis’s attack on Malta in 1551, and the Turks’ utter destruction of an allied Christian fleet at the Battle of Djerba in 1560.
Fernand Braudel, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, vol. II.,
(University of California Press: Berkeley, 1995).
[xii] “In countries on every continent, I saw how men and women working for U.S. corporations—though not officially part of the ‘network’ [i.e., NSA/CIA economic hit men like me (EHM)]—participated in something far more pernicious than anything envisioned in conspiracy theories. Like many of my company’s engineers, these workers were blind to the consequences of their actions, convinced that the sweatshops and factories that made shoes and automotive parts for their companies were helping the poor climb out of poverty, instead of simply burying them deeper in a type of slavery reminiscent of medieval manors and southern plantations. Like those earlier manifestations of exploitation, modern serfs or slaves were socialized into believing they were better off than the unfortunate souls who lived on the margins in the dark hollows of Europe, in the jungles of Africa, or the wilds of the American frontier… EHMs are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. They funnel money from the World Bank, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the IMF and other foreign ‘aid’ organizations into the coffers of huge corporations and the pockets of a few wealthy families who control the planet’s natural resources. Their tools include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and murder. They play a game as old as empire, but one that has taken on new and terrifying dimensions during this time of globalization. I should know; I was an EHM.”
John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, Barrett-Koehler, 2004
[xiii] James Jesus Angelton, Silvio Berlusconi, Tony Blair, Michael Bloomberg, John Robert Bolton, Pat Buchanan, James Buckley, William F. Buckley, Jr., George H.W Bush, George W. Bush, Jeb Bush, Precott Bush, Jr., Frank Capra, (King) Juan Carlos, William Casey, Bill Clinton, Giscard d’Estaing, Bill Donovan, Allen Dulles, Avery Dulles, (Archbishop) Edward Egan, Reinhard Gehlen (Hitler’s Chief of Secret Service), Rudy Giuliani, Gen. Alexander Haig, William Randolph Hearst, Heinrich Himmler, Richard Holbrooke, J. Edgar Hoover, Leonard G. Horowitz, Lee Iococca, Ted Kennedy, Henry A. Kissinger, Rupert Murdoch, Oliver North, Franz von Papen, Ronald E. Reagan, Nelson Rockefeller, David Rockefeller, Antonin Scalia (Supreme Court), Frank Sinatra, Cardinal Francis Spellman, George Tenet, Amschel Mayer von Rothschild, Kurt Waldheim, Gen. William Westmoreland, General Vernon Walters, William Colby, James Angleton, etc. etc.
General Joseph Edward Schmitz/ Former Inspector General Department of Defense
Opus Dei / Knight of Malta / Now Works for Blackwater as Executive / son of the late John G. Schmitz, former California State Senator, Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and U.S. Presidential candidate (1972). Columba Bush’s sister is married to John P. Schmitz, a beneficiary of the fellowship programs subsumed under the Carl Duisberg gesellschaft and the brother of Joseph Schmitz, currently the head of the Blackwater security outfit. John P. Schmitz has close links to the elder George Bush, the 9/11 milieu…
GEORGE SOROS Member: Council on Foreign Relations / Member: Carlyle Group / Multi-billionaire
Major Stockholder: Halliburton / Hungarian Jew: Socialist-Communist / Financial Backer of Barack Hussein Obama, Friend of Rupert Murdoch, also a Knight of Malta
A note on Dulles, et alia :
“Gen, R. Gehlen’s new employer, the OSS, working with the Vatican, not only encouraged but financed an escape mechanism negotiated and set up by Gehlen for his Nazi colleagues. Although the Vatican has always been ‘blamed’ for developing the rat-lines, for which it provided ample cover in its monastic and church establishments (enabling operatives like Karol Wojtila to enter holy orders, an alternative option), it was in fact the so-called Gehlen Organisation which established, with OSS assiatence, the underground escape networks which Nazi war criminals could use to escape prosecution by war crimes tribunals. As a consequence, more than 5,000 nazis secretly made their way out of Europe, and were relocated all over the world.” Among the Nazi expatriate communities were the notorious ‘high’ Illuminist Dr. Josef Mengele, who collaborated with US intelligence and whose specialty had been to conduct crude experiments on Jewish concentration camps inmates—and the infamous ‘Butcher of Lyons’ the mass murderer, Klaus Barbie. It is believed that James Jesus Angleton, who worked for the Abwehr agent Allen Dulles and who later in life grew orchids—a plant with occult connotations—for pleasure, was primarily responsible for providing escaping Nazis with new identities prior to their leaving the detainment camps… Allen Dulles and James Jesus Angleton. Angleton and his close associate, Miles Copeland, favored using private businessmen to conduct operations that the CIA was satutorialy barred from undertaking… International Christian Leadership fitted the bill very nicely.”
The New Underworld Order: Curse of Criminalism: Dark Actors Playing Games; Pub.: Edward Harle Ltd. (2007)
by Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA (1938 – 14 July 2010), p. 535.
** After the Holy Land was lost by the Catholics and the main chivalric order – the Knights Templar – was shut down (1312), many attempts were made either to retake the territories lost to the Muslims or to fill the empty space left by the Templars. Two honorific chivalry orders that appeared between this time and the conquest of Constantinople by the Turks (1453) were the Order of St. George of the Garter in 1348, and the Order of the Golden Fleece in 1430.
The Order of the Golden Fleece has a much different origin. In 1396 the Duke of Bourgogne, John the Fearless, the most powerful lord of the West, took part in a crusade against the Turks in Nicopolis. He fought so bravely that it was there he earned his nickname of fearless. The failure of the crusade greatly influenced his son, Philip III the Good, who wanted to take up his father’s fight. Based on this desire, as well as with the purpose of defending the Catholic Church against her enemies, he decided to found a chivalric order… on January 10, 1430 when he married Princess Isabel of Portugal, he founded the Order of the Golden Fleece… to celebrate a royal Catholic marriage:
Pour maintenir l’Eglise qui est de Dieu maison,
J’ai mis sus le noble Ordre, qu’on nome Toison
To support the Church, which is the House of God,
I established the noble Order that is called the Fleece.
The Spanish branch is ruled by Juan Carlos, King of Spain, and has 17 members. Juan Carlos has introduced innovations that have denigrated the Order. Against its tradition as a Catholic Order, he made non-Catholics members: one Schismatic, Constantin of Greece; five Protestants, Elizabeth of England, Carl Gustaf of Sweden, Beatrix of the Netherlands, Margaret of Denmark, and Harald of Norway; two Buddhists, Akihito of Japan and Bhumidol of Thailand. And now, on June 18 of this year, he made a Muslim member – Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.
Hugh O’Reilly, Historian for Tradition In Action an NGO committed to defend the perennial
Magisterium Of Holy Mother Church and Catholic traditions.
*** Fidel Castro attended three Jesuit institutions. College Lasalle and Colegio Dolores. “Colegio” in Spanish is a high school or junior college. He then attended a Jesuit university for “preparatory” studies-obviously, what we would call a “general studies” program–at Colegio Belen, “general studies,” because, after he matriculated from there, he went to law school.
Upon graduating from law school he joined the Orthodox or Christian Democrat party. My European readers will instantly recognize that this is the Roman Catholic Party. The first Christian Democrat party began in Italy under Pius XI in the 1920’s. Pius XI later disbanded that party, then put his full support behind Benito Mussolini and his Fascists. The leader of the Christian Democrat party was then forced into exile, though he and Pope Pius XI remained on good speaking terms. It was in London that this leader met a fellow exile – Avro Manhattan.
Returning to Fidel Castro : Castro was obviously fully working for the Jesuits when he joined the Christian Democrat party as a young lawyer. By the time of the Cuban revolution in 1958-59, the Jesuits – in Latin America, were Marxist-Leninist in ideology, as Avro Manhattan and former Jesuit priest, Malachi Martin, well documented. Malachi Martin documents how, in 1963, the Jesuits became fanatic, left-wing Communists, under Pedro Arrupe, a Marxist, and a great advocate of Fidel Castro. Martin documents in his book: “The Jesuits and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church” how the Jesuits proceeded to foment Communist revolutions throughout Latin America and Africa, with Castro’s aid.
The late, former Jesuit Father Alberto Rivera revealed that the Jesuit General Pedro Arrupe was the head of the Communist Party in Spain. He also said that Castro is a fourth-degree, professed Jesuit. The circumstantial evidence strongly corroborates that statement.
[xiv] The big banks that caused the collapse of the global finance market, and received tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded bailouts, have likely been engaging in wholesale fraud against homeowners and the courts. But in a promising development this week, attorneys general from all 50 states announced a bipartisan joint investigation into foreclosure fraud. Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, GMAC and other big mortgage lenders recently suspended most foreclosure proceedings, following revelations that thousands of their foreclosures were being conducted like “foreclosure mills,” with tens of thousands of legal documents signed by low-level staffers with little or no knowledge of what they were signing. Then the Obama administration signaled that it was not supporting a foreclosure moratorium. Not long after, Bank of America announced it was restarting its foreclosure operations. GMAC followed suit, and others will likely join in. So much for the voluntary moratorium. GMAC Mortgage engaged in mass document processing, dubbed “robo-signing.” In several cases, GMAC Mortgage filed documents with courts that were signed by Jeffrey Stephan. Stephan presided over a staff of 12 in suburban Philadelphia. Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray filed a lawsuit against GMAC Mortgage, Stephan and the bank that owns GMAC, Ally Financial (itself a subsidiary of General Motors). According to one report, Stephan received 10,000 mortgage foreclosure documents to process in one month. Based on an eight-hour workday, he would have had to read, verify and sign, in the presence of a notary, about one document per minute. He admitted to signing documents without reading them or checking the facts about homeowners said to be in default. And Stephan was just one of many “robo-signers.” Recall that GM received $51 billion in taxpayer bailouts; its subsidiary, GMAC, received $16.3 billion; and Ally Financial subsidiary GMAC Mortgage received $1.5 billion as an “incentive payment for home loan modification.” So taxpayers may have bailed out a bank that is fraudulently foreclosing on them.
“When Banks Are the Robbers,” by Amy Goodman, 20 Oct 2010, World News Daily
Wall Street banks are this week expected to announce bumper profits, paving the way for huge bonuses to bankers, putting their staff in London back under scrutiny as the rest of the country braces for swingeing cuts in public spending.
Investment banks will disclose third-quarter results that will underline a healthy return to profitability since the banking meltdown of 2008. Last week, JP Morgan kicked off the reporting season by revealing big increases in income and profits, as well as announcing it had set aside more than £4bn for pay and bonuses. The bank earned £2.79bn for the quarter, compared with £2.27bn at the same time last year, though profits in the investment banking division fell. Chief executive Jamie Dimon said income had risen because the bank was setting aside less money to cover loan losses.
Citigroup, which is 10% owned by the US government, reports today, followed by Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Although profits will look healthy compared with two years ago, the trading performance in some divisions could disappoint, especially in equities where there has been a dearth of activity. Analysts add that some traders have been wrong-footed by volatility in currency and commodities markets. But the banks will report lower impairment charges, reflecting a continuing decline in credit losses and bad debt. Credit Suisse will also report this week. More than half of Britain’s bankers expect to see substantial rises in their bonus payouts this year, according to a survey by eFinancial careers, a recruitment website.
In the US, bankers’ pay is on track to break a record high for a second consecutive year, according to The Wall Street Journal. A WSJ study published last week said three dozen of the top publicly held securities and investment-services firms – which include banks, investment banks, hedge funds, money-management firms and securities exchanges – are set to pay $144bn in compensation and benefits this year, a 4% increase from the $139bn paid out in 2009. Revenue was expected to rise at 29 of the 35 firms surveyed, but at a slower pace than pay. Banks are benefiting from low interest rates and strong international markets and are determined to base their pay on economic and market conditions rather than yield to pressure coming from regulators and politicians.
Last month, Goldman was forced to defend its decision to award about 80 of its senior bankers in London free shares worth millions of pounds. Goldman said the handouts were essential to prevent top dealmakers from defecting to rivals, following a tax on bonuses imposed by the former Labour government. The bank argued it had capped compensation for its partners at £1m in 2009, but that competitors shelled out much larger payments. Several of its top executives left to take up positions with other banks. Lord Oakeshott, the Lib Dem treasury spokesman, said: “The bonus merry-go-round never seems to stop at Goldman and is a sign of the bank making super-normal profits.”
Richard Wachman; “Wall Street banks set to announce bumper profits”
The Guardian, Monday, 18 Oct 2010